December 2002
Volume 43, Issue 13
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   December 2002
Screening for Glaucoma with the Non Mydriatic Fundus Camera (NMFu-Camera) and the Frequency Doubled Perimeter (FDP)
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • M DetryBelgian Glaucoma Society
    Ophthalmology St Luc Univ Hosp Univ Catholique Brussels Belgium
  • P Kestelyn
    Brussels Belgium
  • J Collignon
    Brussels Belgium
  • M Goethal
    Brussels Belgium
  • T Zeyen
    Brussels Belgium
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   M. Detry, None; P. Kestelyn , None; J. Collignon , None; M. Goethal , None; T. Zeyen , None.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science December 2002, Vol.43, 1002. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      M DetryBelgian Glaucoma Society, P Kestelyn, J Collignon, M Goethal, T Zeyen; Screening for Glaucoma with the Non Mydriatic Fundus Camera (NMFu-Camera) and the Frequency Doubled Perimeter (FDP) . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2002;43(13):1002.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Abstract: : Purpose: To evaluate the usefulness of the NMFu-Camera and the FDP for detecting glaucoma in a general population. Methods: The population of 3 belgian cities was invited by advertisement in newspaper and TV to present for glaucoma screening.The IOP was measured with the non-contact pneumo-tonometer(NCT) followed by an applanation tonometry(AT)if the NCT-IOP was ≷ or equal to 17 mmHg.The visual field was screened with the FDP(C-20-5) and optic disc photographs (ODP's) were taken with the NMFu-Camera(Canon CR6-45NM).FDP was considered abnormal if at least one defective point was found. The ODP's were graded as normal or glaucomatous by consensus of 3 glaucoma specialists. Treated patients were excluded from the analysis. Results: 1800 subjects were examined and 1684 included in the study.The mean age was 63.5 +-10.8 years.Six percent had AT-IOP measurement ≷21 mmHg. 97.6% of the ODP's could be interpreted.Glaucomatous optic discs were detected in 3.7% of the subjects.FDP was abnormal in one eye in 19% and in both eyes in 23% of the subjects.The sensitivity and specificity of FDP in detecting the eyes with glaucomatous optic discs were 57% and 69% respectively. Conclusion: The non-mydriatic fundus Camera is a useful method to screen for glaucoma.FDP in screening strategy is not sensitive enough when the cut-off value is set at one defective test location.


This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.