December 2002
Volume 43, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   December 2002
Clinical Comparison of the ProviewTM Eye Pressure Monitor with Goldmann Applanation Tonometry in Healthy Eyes
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • SA Gollance
    Dept of Ophthalmology UMDNJ-NJ Medical School Newark NJ
  • RD Fechtner
    Dept of Ophthalmology UMDNJ-NJ Medical School Newark NJ
  • AD Realini
    Dept of Ophthalmology University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences Little Rock AR
  • E Buroff
    Dept of Ophthalmology UMDNJ-NJ Medical School Newark NJ
  • PR D'Amato
    Dept of Ophthalmology UMDNJ-NJ Medical School Newark NJ
  • PJ Lama
    Dept of Ophthalmology UMDNJ-NJ Medical School Newark NJ
  • R Greene
    New Jersey Institute of Technology Newark NJ
  • G Thomas
    New Jersey Institute of Technology Newark NJ
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   S.A. Gollance, None; R.D. Fechtner, None; A.D. Realini, None; E. Buroff, None; P.R. D'Amato, None; P.J. Lama, None; R. Greene, None; G. Thomas, None. Grant Identification: Support: RPB, Inc.; Glaucoma Research & Education Foundation, Inc.; B&L provided Proview tonometers.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science December 2002, Vol.43, 1067. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      SA Gollance, RD Fechtner, AD Realini, E Buroff, PR D'Amato, PJ Lama, R Greene, G Thomas; Clinical Comparison of the ProviewTM Eye Pressure Monitor with Goldmann Applanation Tonometry in Healthy Eyes . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2002;43(13):1067.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose: The ProviewTM Eye Pressure Monitor (ProviewTM, Bausch& Lomb) is intended to allow patients to measure their intraocularpressure (IOP) independently. This study assesses the accuracyand reproducibility of the ProviewTM as compared to Goldmannapplanation tonometry.Methods: Prospective clinical trial.Measurements were acquired from one randomly selected eye from32 normal subjects. In order to assess intra- and inter-devicereproducibility and accuracy of the ProviewTM, 5 measurementswere obtained with each of 5 different ProviewTM devices followedby Goldmann applanation tonometry (gold standard).Results:In accessing accuracy of the ProviewTM device, the mean IOPdifference between ProviewTM and Goldmann tonometry measurementswas +0.5 mmHg with a standard deviation of 3.1 mmHg (range -5to +16). The total discrepancy expressed as root mean squareerror (RMSE) was 3.1 mmHg. In accessing reproducibility, the800 IOP measurements with the ProviewTM device varied from 8to 30 mmHg with a mean of 13.9 mmHg and a standard deviationof 2.8 mmHg. Variance of the ProviewTM measurements is givenin the table below.Conclusion: For the range of IOPs in thispopulation, the ProviewTM tonometer was, on average, reproducibleand accurate. Multiple measurements are advisable. It is unclearwhether this device will be useful for detecting small changesin IOP within a normal range, but may be useful for detectinglarger changes. Accuracy Results (diff = device - gold standard(GS) difference)  

Reproducibility Results (SD = square root(variance))  

Keywords: 444 intraocular pressure • 356 clinical (human) or epidemiologic studies: systems/equipment/techniques 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×