December 2002
Volume 43, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   December 2002
How the Eye Can Turn Exponental Decays Into a Gaussian Distribution
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • JH Parkes
    Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics University of Pennsylvania Medical Center Philadelphia PA
  • PA Liebman
    Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics University of Pennsylvania Medical Center Philadelphia PA
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   J.H. Parkes, None; P.A. Liebman, None. Grant Identification: NIH Grant 00012
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science December 2002, Vol.43, 1422. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      JH Parkes, PA Liebman; How the Eye Can Turn Exponental Decays Into a Gaussian Distribution . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2002;43(13):1422.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose: Vertebrate rods respond to single photons with high reproducibility, generating a Gaussian distribution of electrical responses, or quantum bumps (Baylor, Lamb, and Yau, 1979). This ruled out, as the terminating event, a single stochastic event that would necessarily yield an exponentially decaying response, and all biochemical reactions are essentially of this type. We wanted to see how a Gaussian response could be generated from exponential decays. Methods: Random activations of G protein, with one or more random phosphorylations and terminated by a final arrestin binding were simulated using a Monte Carlo method. Results: As the number of phosphorylations required to deactivate rhodopsin increases, the resulting distribution increasingly resembles a Gaussian (Figure).  

The shape of these distributions does not depend on the relative frequencies of G protein activations and phosphorylations, but is a consequence solely of the fact that the specified number of random events must occur for deactivation. However, the distributions all have too great a frequency at the high end. Some limitation is needed in the number of G proteins that can be activated. An absolute limit of about 350 G proteins per R* gives the distribution a symmetric Gaussian shape. Equally, a reduction in the density of inactive G proteins in the immediate vicinity of the R* to some lower steady state level can be sufficient. Conclusion: Deactivation of rhodopsin is the only step in visual excitation that presents this problem since there is only one active R* molecule. Because there are so many of them, G proteins and PDEs may individually exhibit stochastic deactivation without affecting the Gaussian shape of the light response.

Keywords: 541 receptors: pharmacology/physiology • 556 retina: neurochemistry 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×