December 2002
Volume 43, Issue 13
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   December 2002
The Effect of Age and Gender on Corneal Sensitivity to a Thermally Cooling Stimulus
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • PJ Murphy
    Dept Optometry & Vis Sci Cardiff University Cardiff United Kingdom
  • A Ntola
    Dept Optometry & Vis Sci Cardiff University Cardiff United Kingdom
  • S Patel
    Common Services Agency Scottish Executive Edinburgh United Kingdom
  • J Marshall
    Dept Experimental Ophthalmology St Thomas' Hospital London United Kingdom
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   P.J. Murphy, None; A. Ntola, None; S. Patel, None; J. Marshall, None.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science December 2002, Vol.43, 1685. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      PJ Murphy, A Ntola, S Patel, J Marshall; The Effect of Age and Gender on Corneal Sensitivity to a Thermally Cooling Stimulus . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2002;43(13):1685.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Abstract: : Purpose: To assess the variation in corneal sensation threshold with age and gender to the thermally cooling stimulus of the Non-Contact Corneal Aesthesiometer (NCCA). Methods: 1) Effect of Age: 96 healthy, non-contact lens wearing subjects were recruited and divided into three groups: Young (up to 29 years) 49 subjects (mean age = 23.1 years), Middle (30-59 years) 27 subjects (mean age = 42.6 years) and Older (60+ years) 20 subjects (mean age = 69 years. 2) Effect of Gender: The 49 young, healthy, non-contact lens wearers were then allocated to one of two sub-groups composing 21 Males (mean age = 24.3 years, range = 20-29) and 28 Females (mean age = 21.9 years, range = 19-28). None of the female subjects in the study were pregnant, or were menstruating at the time of measurement, nor were they taking any medication that could interfere with normal hormone levels. 3) Instrumentation: The corneal sensation threshold was located for the centre of the right eye of each subject and also at three peripheral locations - temporal, nasal and inferior, approximately 1mm from the limbus - using the NCCA. This instrument produces a controlled pulse of air, of known pressure and duration, which is directed at the anterior surface of the eye. The air-pulse causes a small, localised reduction in the surface temperature of the eye, which is detected by the nerves in the corneal epithelium. The corneal sensation threshold for this stimulus was assessed using a double-staircase, method of limits technique. Results: : Log transformation of the data was necessary to allow parametric statistical analysis. 1) Effect of Age: Significant differences were found between the central corneal sensation thresholds for the three groups: two-way t-test, p=0.001. A similar pattern of significant differences was found when the three peripheral corneal testing locations were compared. 2) Effect of Gender: No significant differences were found between Male and Female corneal sensation thresholds at any testing location: two-way t-test, p≷0.05. Conclusion: The pattern of change in corneal sensation with age and gender to a thermally cooling stimulus has been assessed. 1) There is a gradual reduction in corneal sensitivity with increasing age, with a corresponding increase in the standard deviation of the mean. 2) There is no difference in corneal sensitivity between young males and females at any of the corneal test locations.

Keywords: 442 innervation: sensation • 369 cornea: clinical science 

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.