December 2002
Volume 43, Issue 13
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   December 2002
Urokinase Activates a Tight Association Between uPAR and the Actin Cytoskeleton in Corneal Fibroblasts
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • AM Bernstein
    Ophthalmology Box 1183
    Mount Sinai Medical School New York NY
  • L Taliana
    Mount Sinai Medical School New York NY
  • R Greenberg
    Mount Sinai Medical School New York NY
  • S Masur
    Mount Sinai Medical School New York NY
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   A.M. Bernstein, None; L. Taliana, None; R. Greenberg, None; S. Masur, None. Grant Identification: NIH Grant F32 EY07049
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science December 2002, Vol.43, 1702. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      AM Bernstein, L Taliana, R Greenberg, S Masur; Urokinase Activates a Tight Association Between uPAR and the Actin Cytoskeleton in Corneal Fibroblasts . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2002;43(13):1702.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Abstract: : Purpose: Upon wounding, activated corneal fibroblasts become migratory, secrete increased amounts of extracellular matrix, as well as proteases that degrade this matrix. We are investigating the cellular and molecular mechanisms that control fibroblast migration and matrix remodeling. The purpose of the current work is to determine how the binding of a corneal fibroblast protease, urokinase (uPA), to its GPI-linked receptor (uPAR) signals intracellularly to the actin cytoskeleton. Method: To visualize in primary human corneal fibroblasts the functional interaction of uPAR with the cytoskeleton, we stripped cell surface uPA (pH 3 glycine), followed by neutralization (pH7.0) and addition of uPA-FITC (0.02 units/µl, pH7.0, 10 min, RT). Standard immunocytochemical localization was performed on p-formadehyde fixed cells. Results: In un-stripped cells, pre-incubation with uPA prior to fixation produces punctate uPAR immunostaining that is dispersed throughout the cell surface. Addition of exogenous uPA to stripped cells produced cell projections in which uPA/uPAR co-localized with F-actin, ß3 integrin, and FAK. To test this putative functional relationship between uPA/uPAR and the actin cytoskeleton, we treated the cells with cytochalasin D to disassemble the actin cytoskeleton. In the absence of an organized actin cytoskeleton we immunodetected uPA/uPAR as large aggregates, presumably because uPAR was not "hooked into" the actin cytoskeleton and could be cross-linked (aggregated) by the uPA antibody used for immunocytochemistry . It is notable that in contrast with its association with the actin cytoskeleton, uPA/uPAR did not co-localize with tubulin, nor α5ß1 integrin, nor vinculin. Furthermore the dispersed uPA/uPAR pattern was not disrupted by nocodazole (a microtubule disassembling drug). Conclusions: Our data support a model in which uPAR's localization is dynamically regulated. Binding uPA to its receptor initiates interaction with ß3 integrin, FAK, and the actin cytoskeleton.

Keywords: 374 cornea: stroma and keratocytes • 631 wound healing • 383 cytoskeleton 

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.