December 2002
Volume 43, Issue 13
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   December 2002
Visual and Cognitive Information Processing After Traumatic Brain Injury: VEP and ERP Studies
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • M McKerral
    Ctr Rech Interdiscipl Readapt(CRIR)-CRLB and Ophthalmol McGill Univ Montreal PQ Canada
  • J Lachapelle
    Neurol-Neurosurg McGill Univ and CRIR-CRLB Montreal PQ Canada
  • J Kremlacek
    Patho-Physiol Charles Univ Hradec-Kralove Czech Republic
  • A Ptito
    Neurol-Neurosurg McGill Univ Montreal PQ Canada
  • P Lachapelle
    Ophthalmol Montreal Children's Hosp-McGill Univ Hosp Ctr Montreal PQ Canada
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   M. McKerral, None; J. Lachapelle, None; J. Kremlacek, None; A. Ptito, None; P. Lachapelle, None. Grant Identification: Support: CIHR, FRSQ, CRIR.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science December 2002, Vol.43, 1803. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      M McKerral, J Lachapelle, J Kremlacek, A Ptito, P Lachapelle; Visual and Cognitive Information Processing After Traumatic Brain Injury: VEP and ERP Studies . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2002;43(13):1803.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Abstract: : Purpose: Individuals having sustained a traumatic brain injury (TBI) often exhibit difficulties related to visual processing as well as more global information processing that can be difficult to objectify with the methods commonly used in the clinical neuro-trauma setting. The present study aimed at evaluating, with the use of objective functional methods, these aspects in relation to TBI severity and recuperation variables. Methods: VEPs and ERPs were obtained from Fz, Cz, Pz, Oz, Ol and Or (5 cm to left and right of Oz) in a cohort of TBI patients of varying severity and at different stages of the recuperation process, as well as in a cohort of normal control subjects. VEPs were recorded to a reversing checkerboard (40 min of arc checks, 96% contrast) and to a randomly moving pattern (40 min of arc checks, 80 min of arc period, 10% contrast). ERPs were obtained by having the subject signal rare events (upward moving pattern) that appeared randomly among frequent events (downward moving pattern). Motor reaction times (RT) were obtained simultaneously to the VEPs and ERPs. Results: Significantly (p<0.05) abnormal VEP responses (amplitude or timing) were obtained from TBI subjects which indicate either pattern-processing, motion-analysis or combined deficits, in the presence or not of a signiticantly (p<0.05) reduced P300 amplitude. Also, the RT was significantly (p<0.05) longer in TBI subjects compared to normal controls, but not always concomitantly with VEP timing delays. VEP and ERP abnormalities generally correlate well with TBI severity. Conclusion: VEPs and ERPs evoked to specific and well-defined stimuli can objectify the presence of post-TBI deficits at primary as well as at more complex levels of information processing. This investigative approach can also help identifying sub-clinical deficits and thus contribute to improve the clinical follow-up of these patients.

Keywords: 393 electrophysiology: clinical • 608 trauma • 621 visual cortex 

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.