December 2002
Volume 43, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   December 2002
A Comparison between the Ocular Aberrations of Natural and Dilated Pupils
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • D Priest
    Ottawa Health Research Institute Ottawa ON Canada
  • MD Lafontaine
    Ottawa Health Research Institute Ottawa ON Canada
  • WB Jackson
    Ottawa Health Research Institute Ottawa ON Canada
  • R Munger
    Ottawa Health Research Institute Ottawa ON Canada
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   D. Priest, None; M.D. Lafontaine, None; W.B. Jackson, None; R. Munger, None.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science December 2002, Vol.43, 2023. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      D Priest, MD Lafontaine, WB Jackson, R Munger; A Comparison between the Ocular Aberrations of Natural and Dilated Pupils . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2002;43(13):2023.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose: To evaluate the equivalence of ocular aberrations measured with a natural pupil to those measured with a dilated pupil. Methods: A VISX Wavescan was used to measure the ocular wavefront aberrations of 7 young normal subjects (Age = 26 ± 5 years, SE = -3.75 ± 3.75 D, Cyl = -0.5 ± 0.75 D). Three consecutive measurements were preformed before and after dilation on each subject. Pupil size (6mm) and defocus compensation were kept constant during the comparison. Aberrations were described by a Zernike polynomial expansion of the 6th order. T-tests were used to identify significant differences (P < 0.05) in aberrations between natural and dilated conditions. Results: After dilation, six of the subjects showed a significant decrease in defocus. Four subjects showed a significant change in the size of their coma. Two of these four subjects displayed a change in their coma’s orientation. There were no significant changes found in the 4th, 5th and 6th order aberrations. Significant changes in the high-order RMS were found in only two subjects. Conclusion: Significant, subject dependent differences were found between the wavefront aberrations measured with natural and dilated pupils. This suggests that, for some patients, aberrations measured with dilated pupils might not be applicable to vision in natural conditions.

Keywords: 519 physiological optics • 534 pupil • 500 optical properties 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×