December 2002
Volume 43, Issue 13
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   December 2002
Are all Aberrations Equal?
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • RA Applegate
    College of Optometry University of Houston Houston TX
  • V Khemsara
    Department of Ophthalmology The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio San Antonio TX
  • E Sarver
    Sarver and Associates Inc Merritt Island FL
  • CA Sarver
    Sarver and Associates Inc Merritt Island FL
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships    R.A. Applegate, Sarver and Associates, Inc. C; V. Khemsara, None; E. Sarver, Sarver and Associates, Inc. P; C.A. Sarver, Sarver and Associates, Inc. P. Grant Identification: NEI RO1 08520
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science December 2002, Vol.43, 2035. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      RA Applegate, V Khemsara, E Sarver, CA Sarver; Are all Aberrations Equal? . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2002;43(13):2035.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Abstract: : Purpose: To determine which aberrations most affect high and low contrast acuity. Methods: 3 healthy volunteers with 20/16 or better acuity served as subjects. CTViewTM generated optically aberrated log MAR charts for a fixed level of aberration (25 microns RMS) for Zernike mode 3 - 14 . Accommodation was paralyzed and pupils dilated with 1% cyclopentolate hydrochloride. The foveal achromatic axis of the eye was aligned to a 3 mm pupil using an achromatic alignicator and a bite bar mounted to a 3 dimensional translator. The eye was optimally refracted for the 10' test distance (i.e., eyes are close to, if not, diffraction limited when optimally corrected and viewing through a 3 mm pupil diameter). Aberrated acuity charts were read until 5 letters were missed. We recorded total letters correct up to the 5th miss. Data was normalized for each subject to the acuity obtained by reading an unaberrated chart and plotted as letters lost as a function of Zernike mode. Results: Defocus (Z02) decreased letter acuity more than astigmatism (Z22 , Z-22). Coma (Z13 , Z-13) decreased acuity more then trefoil (Z33 , Z-33). Spherical aberration (Z04) and secondary astigmatism (Z24 , Z-24) decreased acuity much more than quadrafoil (Z44 , Z-44). Conclusion: 1) Not all modes of the Zernike polynomial induce equivalent losses in visual function for a fixed level of RMS error. 2) Large aberration-induced changes in chart appearance were not reflected in equally large decreases in visual acuity. This finding is consistent with the common patient complaint: "I can read the chart but it does not look as good as it used to."

Keywords: 550 refractive surgery: optical quality • 500 optical properties • 620 visual acuity 

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.