December 2002
Volume 43, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   December 2002
Machine Learning Classifiers In The Diagnosis And Follow-up Of Glaucoma Using Short-wavelength Automated Perimetry (SWAP)
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • C Boden
    Glaucoma Center Ophthalmology
    University of California San Diego La Jolla CA
  • K Chan
    Institute for Neural Computation
    University of California San Diego La Jolla CA
  • M Goldbaum
    Glaucoma Center Ophthalmology
    University of California San Diego La Jolla CA
  • TW Lee
    Institute for Neural Computation
    University of California San Diego La Jolla CA
  • T Sejnowski
    Computational Neurobiology Laboratories Salk Institute La Jolla CA
  • AG Boehm
    Glaucoma Center Ophthalmology
    University of California San Diego La Jolla CA
  • M Aihara
    Glaucoma Center Ophthalmology
    University of California San Diego La Jolla CA
  • RN Weinreb
    Glaucoma Center Ophthalmology
    University of California San Diego La Jolla CA
  • PA Sample
    Glaucoma Center Ophthalmology
    University of California San Diego La Jolla CA
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   C. Boden, None; K. Chan, None; M. Goldbaum, None; T.W. Lee, None; T. Sejnowski, None; A.G. Boehm, None; M. Aihara, None; R.N. Weinreb, None; P.A. Sample, None. Grant Identification: Support:NIH Grant EY08208; LM05759;RPB
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science December 2002, Vol.43, 2127. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      C Boden, K Chan, M Goldbaum, TW Lee, T Sejnowski, AG Boehm, M Aihara, RN Weinreb, PA Sample; Machine Learning Classifiers In The Diagnosis And Follow-up Of Glaucoma Using Short-wavelength Automated Perimetry (SWAP) . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2002;43(13):2127.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose: To evaluate the performance of machine classifiers in diagnosing glaucoma from short-wavelength automated perimetry (PHASE 1) and to evaluate the ability of machine classifiers to predict the development of abnormal fields at follow-up in eyes with a normal baseline field (PHASE 2). Methods: PHASE 1 Raw thresholds and ages from 158 eyes with glaucomatous optic neuropathy (GON) and 186 normal eyes served as training input to a linear discriminant function (LDF) and two types of support vector machine (SVMl and SVMg), a mixture of Gaussian classifier (MoG), a constrained MoG (QDF) and a multilayer perceptron (MLP). PHASE 2 Serial SWAP fields from 68 eyes with IOP greater than 24, a normal baseline field, at least 4 fields and optic disc stereophotographs were included. Machine classifiers from Phase 1 categorized fields as normal or abnormal. Specificity was set at 95% for the machine classifiers using longitudinal data from 94 normal eyes, matching the specificity of the statpac-like analysis (STAT). Specificity cut-offs required confirmation of abnormality on two successive visual fields. Results: PHASE 1. Areas under the ROC were 0.77 for LDF, 0.80 for MLP, 0.82 for SVMl, and 0.83 for QDF and SVMg. PHASE 2. A mean±SD of 5.99±1.93 visual fields were completed over 6.67±2.40 years. 19% (13/68) of eyes converted by STAT. Of those eyes, 6 to 9 eyes were found to have converted by SVM (SVMl and SVMg). However, 20 eyes converted by at least 1 machine classifier that did not convert by STAT and 15 of these had GON. LDF identified the most converts (22 eyes) of which 17 had GON. Conclusion: The sensitivity in Phase 1 was not as good as our previous results with SAP. It is possible that SWAP may be influenced to a greater extent by generalized depression than SAP. We are currently pursuing this hypothesis. However, in Phase 2 the machine classifiers identified a larger number of GON as converts than STAT. CR:None Supported by NIH Grants EY08208 (PAS), LM05759 (MHG), and Research to Prevent Blindness (PAS)

Keywords: 624 visual fields • 511 perimetry 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×