December 2002
Volume 43, Issue 13
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   December 2002
Integrated Visual fields: A New Approach to Estimating Binocular Visual Fields and Visual Disability
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • DP Crabb
    Faculty of Science Nottingham Trent University Nottingham United Kingdom
  • AC Viswanathan
    Institute of Ophthalmology London United Kingdom
  • FW Fitzke
    Institute of Ophthalmology London United Kingdom
  • RA Hitchings
    Moorfields Eye Hospital London United Kingdom
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   D.P. Crabb, None; A.C. Viswanathan, None; F.W. Fitzke, None; R.A. Hitchings, None.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science December 2002, Vol.43, 2143. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      DP Crabb, AC Viswanathan, FW Fitzke, RA Hitchings; Integrated Visual fields: A New Approach to Estimating Binocular Visual Fields and Visual Disability . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2002;43(13):2143.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Abstract: : Purpose: We have developed a method of quantifying the central binocular visual field by merging results from monocular fields (Integrated visual field)1. To compare the performance of the new measure with the binocular Esterman Visual Field Test (EVFT) in identifying patients with self-reported visual disability. To examine the relationship between the new measure and the Useful Field of View (UFOV) test. Methods: Forty-eight patients with glaucoma each recorded Humphrey 24-2 fields for both eyes and a binocular EVFT on the same visit. They each completed a binary forced-choice questionnaire relating to perceived visual disability2. Computer software merged sensitivity values from monocular fields to generate an integrated visual field and a related score of the percentage of defects at the <10dB and <20dB level. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to compare the integrated visual field score and the EVFT score with individual responses to the questions on perceived difficulty with visual tasks. Results: Comparison of areas under ROC curves revealed that the integrated visual field measure was generally better (median area: 0.85) than EVFT scores (median area: 0.72) in classifying patients with or without a self reported visual disability. Comparison between the integrated visual field measure, EVFT and UFOV test results will also be presented. Conclusion: The integrated visual field provides a rapid assessment of a patient's binocular visual field without extra perimetric testing and it appears to provide a better prediction of a patient's inability to perform visual tasks than the binocular EVFT. The integrated visual field may be useful in alerting patients to compromises in their visual function that may, for example, have a bearing on fitness to drive. 1.Crabb DP et al. (1998). Br J Ophthalmol. 82: 1236-1241. 2.Viswanathan AC et al. (1999). Arch Ophthalmol. 117: 450-454.

Keywords: 624 visual fields • 511 perimetry • 536 quality of life 

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.