December 2002
Volume 43, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   December 2002
Screening for Glaucoma in India with the Frequency Doubling Perimetry Test
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • SL Mansberger
    Devers Eye Institute/Discoveries in Sight Portland OR
  • CA Johnson
    Devers Eye Institute/Discoveries in Sight Portland OR
  • GA Cioffi
    Devers Eye Institute/Discoveries in Sight Portland OR
  • R Krishnadas
    Aravind Medical Research Foundation Madurai India
  • M Srinivasan
    Aravind Medical Research Foundation Madurai India
  • V Balamurugan
    Aravind Medical Research Foundation Madurai India
  • U Kim
    Aravind Medical Research Foundation Madurai India
  • SD Smith
    Cole Eye Institute Cleveland OH
  • JH Wilkins
    Francis I Proctor Foundation San Francisco CA
  • DC Gritz
    Francis I Proctor Foundation San Francisco CA
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   S.L. Mansberger, None; C.A. Johnson, Welch Allyn C; G.A. Cioffi, None; R. Krishnadas, None; M. Srinivasan, None; V. Balamurugan, None; U. Kim, None; S.D. Smith, None; J.H. Wilkins, None; D.C. Gritz, None.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science December 2002, Vol.43, 2154. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      SL Mansberger, CA Johnson, GA Cioffi, R Krishnadas, M Srinivasan, V Balamurugan, U Kim, SD Smith, JH Wilkins, DC Gritz; Screening for Glaucoma in India with the Frequency Doubling Perimetry Test . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2002;43(13):2154.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose: To determine the utility of the Frequency Doubling Perimetry Test (FDT) for screening for glaucoma in a rural, developing world setting. Methods: FDT (C-20-5 screening protocol), best-corrected visual acuity, tonometry, anterior segment biomicroscopy, grading of cataract with the Lens Opacities Grading System (LOCS), and dilated ophthalmoscopy was performed in participants over 35 years old in South Indian villages near Madurai. If there was an abnormal location or an unreliable result, the FDT was repeated. Excluding other ocular disease and unreliable visual fields, a repeatable, abnormal FDT was defined as one abnormal location on the FDT printout present in the initial and repeat examination. An abnormal optic nerve was defined as a cup to disc ratio of greater than 0.5 or glaucomatous features. Results: There were 296 participants (592 eyes) tested over three days with a single FDT machine. 19% of eyes were unreliable with initial FDT testing but only 5% had a repeatable, unreliable FDT. Using one eye for analysis determined by worsening optic disc appearance, 2.4% of eyes had an abnormal optic nerve and a repeatable, abnormal FDT. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of FDT for an abnormal optic nerve was 11%, 87%, 19%, 76%, and 69%, respectively. Conclusion: The FDT can be used to screen large numbers of persons for glaucoma rapidly with reliable results. In this type of setting, it has good specificity but low sensitivity. Therefore, the utility of a single screening test for glaucoma may be limited.

Keywords: 624 visual fields • 511 perimetry • 356 clinical (human) or epidemiologic studies: systems/equipment/techniques 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×