December 2002
Volume 43, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   December 2002
Evaluation of Two Macular Carotenoid Measurement Methods: Resonance Raman Spectroscopy and Heterochromatic Flicker Photometry
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • SW Wintch
    Physics
    University of Utah Salt Lake City UT
  • D-Y Zhao
    Moran Eye Center
    University of Utah Salt Lake City UT
  • IV Ermakov
    Physics
    University of Utah Salt Lake City UT
  • RW McClane
    Physics
    University of Utah Salt Lake City UT
  • W Gellermann
    Physics
    University of Utah Salt Lake City UT
  • PS Bernstein
    Moran Eye Center
    University of Utah Salt Lake City UT
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   S.W. Wintch, None; D. Zhao, None; I.V. Ermakov, None; R.W. McClane, Spectrotek P; W. Gellermann, Spectrotek P; P.S. Bernstein, Spectrotek P. Grant Identification: Support: NIH Grant EY12324 and 11600; Spectrotek; Research to Prevent Blindness
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science December 2002, Vol.43, 2551. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      SW Wintch, D-Y Zhao, IV Ermakov, RW McClane, W Gellermann, PS Bernstein; Evaluation of Two Macular Carotenoid Measurement Methods: Resonance Raman Spectroscopy and Heterochromatic Flicker Photometry . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2002;43(13):2551.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose:Two xanthophyll carotenoid pigments, lutein and zeaxanthin, are concentrated in the human macula where they may play a protective role against age-related macular degeneration (AMD), the leading cause of blindness in the elderly. Several noninvasive optical techniques have been proposed to quantify these macular pigments, but they have substantial methodological differences. This study compares two such methods: resonance Raman spectroscopy (RRS) and heterochromatic flicker photometry (HFP). Methods:RRS is an objective optical method; it involves argon laser light resonantly exciting the carotenoids in the macula which then backscatter light to be collected and analyzed by a Raman spectrograph. HFP is a subjective psychophysical technique involving intensity matching of blue and green light at foveal and parafoveal sites. The macular pigment levels of 22 healthy subjects age 20 to 61 were quantified using the above two methods over three consecutive sessions. Results:RRS and HFP correlate significantly (P<0.002), and both methods show a decline with age, although it is more obvious in RRS (R=0.575) relative to HFP (R=0.307). RRS intrasession and intersession measurements are more repeatable than those of HFP. Neither method correlates significantly with serum levels of lutein and zeaxanthin. Conclusion:RRS is a specific and sensitive method for measuring macular pigment levels that in our hands is more precise and repeatable than HFP. Our findings confirm earlier results that macular pigment levels decrease with age. As an objective method, RRS is reliable even in individuals with significant macular pathology, and we have previously shown with RRS that macular carotenoid levels are significantly lower in AMD eyes relative to age-matched controls (see ARVO 2001 abstract number 674).

Keywords: 337 carotenoids/carotenoid binding proteins • 356 clinical (human) or epidemiologic studies: systems/equipment/techniques • 309 aging 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×