December 2002
Volume 43, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   December 2002
Screening for Amblyopia in Preverbal Children With Photoscreening Photographs: Identifying the Source of Interobserver Variability and Improving Agreement
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • AH Kim
    Ophthalmology Wilmer Eye Institute Baltimore MD
  • JY Chen
    Ophthalmology Wilmer Eye Institute Baltimore MD
  • B Lengauer
    Ophthalmology Wilmer Eye Institute Baltimore MD
  • WL Ottar-Pfeiffer
    University of Iowa Iowa City IA
  • SI Holgado
    University of Iowa Iowa City IA
  • WE Scott
    University of Iowa Iowa City IA
  • PY Tong
    Ophthalmology Wilmer Eye Institute Baltimore MD
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   A.H. Kim, None; J.Y. Chen, None; B. Lengauer, None; W.L. Ottar-Pfeiffer, None; S.I. Holgado, None; W.E. Scott, None; P.Y. Tong, None.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science December 2002, Vol.43, 2666. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      AH Kim, JY Chen, B Lengauer, WL Ottar-Pfeiffer, SI Holgado, WE Scott, PY Tong; Screening for Amblyopia in Preverbal Children With Photoscreening Photographs: Identifying the Source of Interobserver Variability and Improving Agreement . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2002;43(13):2666.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose: One limitation of photograph-based photoscreening is inter-grader variability. To decrease this variability, we dissected the grading process for refractive error into three parts: (i) determining the adequacy of the photograph, (ii) measuring the dimensions of pupils and crescents, and (iii) deducing the presence of supra-threshold refractive error from the measurements obtained. Because step (ii) is the major source of variability, we determined its magnitude and devised a method to minimize it. Methods:Using digital calipers, two graders measured the bright crescent and pupil dimensions of 955 photographs from two prior studies. The 5% most discrepant were remeasured. The R squared correlation values of interclass plots measured the agreement between the graders. Results:Between the two graders, the more consistent 95% differed by 0.16mm±0.27 (mean±SD, range of 0.00-1.13mm) and 0.22mm±0.15 (range of 0.00-0.60mm)for bright crescents and pupils, respectively. Their more discrepant 5% differed by 1.94mm±1.01 (range of 1.14-6.76mm) and 0.86mm±0.39 (range of 0.61-3.25mm) for bright crescents and pupils, respectively. Remeasurements of this 5% differed by 1.00mm±0.69 (range of 0.00-7.98mm) and 0.36mm±0.24 (range of 0.00-3.55mm) for bright crescents and pupils, respectively. The mean difference more than halved with remeasurement. In the interclass plots for the 955 photographs, the correlation values were ∼ 0.62 and 0.87 for bright crescents and pupils, respectively. The more discrepant 5% had correlation values of ∼ 0.01 and 0.43 for bright crescents and pupils, respectively. The remeasured 5% had higher values of ∼ 0.11 and 0.86 for bright crescents and pupils, respectively. Agreement was consistently higher for pupils than it was for crescents. In addition, remeasurements improved agreement. Conclusion:We conclude; (i) multiple gradings reduce variability; (ii) measurements of crescents, as compared to those of pupils, result in greater variability; (iii) an objective method to identify the bright crescent-dark crescent junction will reduce the variability.

Keywords: 356 clinical (human) or epidemiologic studies: systems/equipment/techniques • 313 amblyopia • 357 clinical (human) or epidemiologic studies: treatment/prevention assessment/controlled clinical trials 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×