December 2002
Volume 43, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   December 2002
Visual Event-related Potentials in Strabismic Suppression
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • MV Joosse
    Department of Ophthalmology
    Westeinde Ziekenhuis The Hague Netherlands
  • S Verspeek
    Department of Neurophysiology
    Westeinde Ziekenhuis The Hague Netherlands
  • RJ Schimshiemer
    Department of Neurophysiology
    Westeinde Ziekenhuis The Hague Netherlands
  • M Vermeulen
    Department of Ophthalmology
    Westeinde Ziekenhuis The Hague Netherlands
  • HM van Minderhout
    Department of Ophthalmology
    Westeinde Ziekenhuis The Hague Netherlands
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   M.V. Joosse, None; S. Verspeek, None; R.J. Schimshiemer, None; M. Vermeulen , None; H.M. van Minderhout, None. Grant Identification: none
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science December 2002, Vol.43, 2942. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      MV Joosse, S Verspeek, RJ Schimshiemer, M Vermeulen, HM van Minderhout; Visual Event-related Potentials in Strabismic Suppression . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2002;43(13):2942.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose: Suppression is the powerful defence mechanism against the unpleasant sensation of diplopia in cross eyedness. It can only be measured under binocular viewing conditions. In this study we objectify strabismic suppression by means of electrophysiological analysis. Through this experiment we also try to gain more insight into which cortical areas are involved in the process of suppression. Methods: Measurements were performed in 10 persons with either convergent or divergent strabismus and in 4 normal control persons. Under binocular viewing conditions, the subjects had a haploscopic view of 2 fusable identical contrastful images, through which 4 lights could be presented. Under monocular viewing conditions one eye was occluded and the lights were presented to the other eye. The stimulus lights had a sinusoidal luminance profile with a duration of 500 msec. With 8 surface electrodes on the posterior third of the skull (3 occipital, 3 parietal and 2 temporal) potentials were recorded upon light stimulation of each eye under monocular as well as under binocular viewing conditions. Results: We found a characteristic triphasic complex of approximately 200msec, that occurred 80 msec after the onset of the triggering light pulse in all subjects under all 4 conditions, except for stimulation of the non-fixating eye under binocular viewing conditions. In 6 of the 10 subjects no response complex could be detected under these conditions. In these subjects there was absence of the response across all 8 leads. In the 4 other test subjects no significant difference in response between monocular and binocular viewing could be found. Conclusion: Suppression involves some sort of neuronal switch, that turns off the activity of a rather large part of the cortex under binocular viewing conditions. Futher research is needed to elicit the exact location of this switch.

Keywords: 588 strabismus • 621 visual cortex • 393 electrophysiology: clinical 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×