December 2002
Volume 43, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   December 2002
Trends in the Indications for Penetrating Keratoplasty, 1980-2001
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • PC Kang
    Ophthalmology Duke University Eye Center Durham NC
  • GK Klintworth
    Departments of Pathology and Ophthalmology Duke University Mecical Center Durham NC
  • A Carlson
    Ophthalmology Duke University Eye Center Durham NC
  • T Kim
    Ophthalmology Duke University Eye Center Durham NC
  • R Afshari Adelman
    Ophthalmology Yale University Eye Center New Haven CT
  • S Stinnett
    Ophthalmology Duke University Eye Center Durham NC
  • NA Afshari
    Ophthalmology Duke University Eye Center Durham NC
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   P.C. Kang, None; G.K. Klintworth, None; A. Carlson, None; T. Kim, None; R. Afshari Adelman, None; S. Stinnett, None; N.A. Afshari, None. Grant Identification: Research to Prevent Blindness
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science December 2002, Vol.43, 3070. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      PC Kang, GK Klintworth, A Carlson, T Kim, R Afshari Adelman, S Stinnett, NA Afshari; Trends in the Indications for Penetrating Keratoplasty, 1980-2001 . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2002;43(13):3070.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose: To study the leading indications and changing trends for penetrating keratoplasty over the past two decades. Methods: The pathologic indications for all penetrating keratoplasties performed at the Duke University Eye Center during January 1, 1980 through December 31 1981; January 1,1990 through December 31, 1991; and January 1, 2000 through October 31, 2001 were reviewed. Each group of two-year intervals served as the basis for comparison. Results: The following summarizes our findings. Leading Pathologic Diagnosis for Penetrating Keratoplasty by Decade  

The remainder of the penetrating keratoplasties performed during 1980-1981 included neoplasms 5 (2.7), keratitis 8 (4.3), perforation 3 (1.6), rheumatoid arthritis 1 (0.5), scar 13 (7.0), trauma 12 (6.5), ulcer 9 (4.8), vascularization 6 (3.2), and other 10 (5.3). The remainder performed during 1990-1991 included neoplasms 7 (2.2), keratitis 21 (6.7), perforation 7 (2.2), rheumatoid arthritis 9 (2.9), scar 28 (8.9), trauma 3 (1.0), ulcer 14 (4.4), vascularization 6 (1.9), and other 22 (7.0). The remainder of cases during 2000-2001 included keratitis 2 (0.6), perforation 2 (0.6), scar 28 (8.5), trauma 7 (2.1), ulcer 13 (4.0), and other 28 (8.5). Conclusion: Currently failed graft, Fuchs' dystrophy, and pseudophakic/aphakic bullous keratopathy are the three most common indications of penetrating keratoplasty. Although in 1980-1981 and 1990-1991 pseudophakic/aphakic bullous keratopathy was the most common indication for penetrating keratoplasty, in 2000-2001 it has dropped to number three. An explantaion for this trend remains to be determined, but it probably reflects improvements in the techniques of cataract surgery and better intraocular lenses.

Keywords: 369 cornea: clinical science • 607 transplantation • 354 clinical (human) or epidemiologic studies: prevalence/incidence 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×