December 2002
Volume 43, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   December 2002
Changes in High and Low Contrast logMAR Visual Acuity with Overnight Orthokeratology
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • MJ Rah
    New England College of Optometry Boston MA
  • MD Bailey
    College of Optometry The Ohio State University Columbus OH
  • LA Jones
    College of Optometry The Ohio State University Columbus OH
  • JM Jackson
    Southern College of Optometry Memphis TN
  • HJ Marsden
    Southern California College of Optometry Fullerton CA
  • JT Barr
    College of Optometry The Ohio State University Columbus OH
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   M.J. Rah, None; M.D. Bailey, None; L.A. Jones, None; J.M. Jackson, None; H.J. Marsden, None; J.T. Barr, None. Grant Identification: American Optometric Foundation CIBA Vision Ezell Fellowship, Paragon Vision Sciences, and NEI R21-EY
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science December 2002, Vol.43, 3095. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      MJ Rah, MD Bailey, LA Jones, JM Jackson, HJ Marsden, JT Barr; Changes in High and Low Contrast logMAR Visual Acuity with Overnight Orthokeratology . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2002;43(13):3095.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose:The difference between unaided logMAR high and low contrast visual acuity was evaluated to determine whether low contrast visual acuity changes at a different rate than high contrast visual acuity over time in a sample of overnight orthokeratology patients. In previous reports in the literature, traditional soft contact lenses, PRK, and LASIK have all been shown to reduce contrast sensitivity and/or low contrast visual acuity. Methods:Two lens designs were used: the Fargo lens from G.P. Specialists and the CRT lens from Paragon Vision Sciences. Subjects were examined at the time of lens removal (morning) and a minimum of 6 hours later (afternoon) at visits one, three and six months following a baseline examination. Standardized protocols to measure high and low contrast visual acuity using Bailey-Lovie charts were used for study outcome measures. Unaided visual acuity was recorded as the number of letters read correctly. This number was converted to logMAR for analysis Results:  

No significant changes were found for any of the above comparisons. Conclusion:Low contrast visual acuity does not improve at a different rate than high contrast visual acuity with overnight orthokeratology.

Keywords: 367 contact lens • 620 visual acuity 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×