December 2002
Volume 43, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   December 2002
The Evaluation Of Cornea-to-contact Lens Base Curve Relationships In Keratoconus Through Fluorescein Pattern Analysis
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • BA Fink
    College of Optometry The Ohio State University Columbus OH
  • JT Barr
    College of Optometry The Ohio State University Columbus OH
  • G Pierce
    College of Optometry The Ohio State University Columbus OH
  • G Mitchell
    College of Optometry The Ohio State University Columbus OH
  • JJ Nichols
    College of Optometry The Ohio State University Columbus OH
  • A Sup
    College of Optometry The Ohio State University Columbus OH
  • LM Badowski
    College of Optometry The Ohio State University Columbus OH
  • G Nixon
    College of Optometry The Ohio State University Columbus OH
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   B.A. Fink, None; J.T. Barr, None; G. Pierce, None; G. Mitchell, None; J.J. Nichols, None; A. Sup, None; L.M. Badowski, None; G. Nixon, None.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science December 2002, Vol.43, 3226. doi:https://doi.org/
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      BA Fink, JT Barr, G Pierce, G Mitchell, JJ Nichols, A Sup, LM Badowski, G Nixon; The Evaluation Of Cornea-to-contact Lens Base Curve Relationships In Keratoconus Through Fluorescein Pattern Analysis . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2002;43(13):3226. doi: https://doi.org/.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose: The usefulness of fluorescein pattern analysis for fitting rigid contact lenses to keratoconic corneas is controversial. The purpose of this study is to assess the accuracy and repeatability of contact lens fluorescein pattern interpretation in keratoconus. Methods: Four clinicians evaluated the fluorescein patterns of three keratoconic patients with varying disease severity. For each subject the contact lens base curve that just cleared the corneal apex, the FDACL lens, was determined. At two separate test sessions, the masked clinicians were given six contact lenses, in random order, from the fitting set, including the FDACL lens, three lenses flatter (in 0.1 mm increments) and three lenses steeper (in 0.1 mm increments) than the FDACL lens. They evaluated the fluorescein patterns at the slit lamp biomicroscope and ranked the lenses from flattest to steepest. Accuracy was evaluated by comparing the clinician's ranking to the true rank. Repeatability was determined by comparing the rankings on the two test sessions. Kappa statistics were used as a quantitative measure of agreement. Results: Accuracy of fluorescein pattern analysis was not significantly different between clinicians (p=0.9591), and repetition was not related to accuracy (p=0.45). Data from all clinicians were then combined to calculate weighted kappa statistics: 0.612 (overall), 0.202-0.892 (range for subjects). As with accuracy, repeatability of the ranking was not significantly related to clinician (p=0.60). Data from all clinicians were combined to calculate weighted kappa statistics: 0.481 (overall), 0.007-0.743 (range for subjects). With only one subject in each disease severity group, it is not possible to determine statistically if accuracy or repeatability are related to severity, although this initial data would suggest there are differences among subjects. Conclusion: No difference was found in the accuracy and repeatability of fluorescein pattern analysis among the four clinicians. Agreement between the correct rating and clinician rating of the cornea-to-contact lens base curve relationship was 0.612 overall. Agreement between sessions was 0.481 overall. Variation in individual subject kappa statistics suggests that characteristics of the cornea (e.g., position of the corneal apex) might influence fluorescein pattern interpretation.

Keywords: 450 keratoconus • 367 contact lens • 356 clinical (human) or epidemiologic studies: systems/equipment/techniques 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×