December 2002
Volume 43, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   December 2002
Glaucoma Screening at Community Senior Centers: Follow-up Assessment
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • T Uhler
    William and Anna Goldberg Glaucoma Service Wills Eye Hospital Philadelphia PA
  • M Kesen
    William and Anna Goldberg Glaucoma Service Wills Eye Hospital Philadelphia PA
  • J Henderer
    William and Anna Goldberg Glaucoma Service Wills Eye Hospital Philadelphia PA
  • W Steinmann
    Center for Clinical Effectiveness and Prevention Tulane Medical Center New Orleans LA
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   T. Uhler, None; M. Kesen, None; J. Henderer, Pharmacia Inc. F; Merck Inc. F; W. Steinmann, None. Grant Identification: Support: Borkee-Hagley Foundation, Support: Heed Ophthalmic Foundation, Support: Pharmacia Inc.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science December 2002, Vol.43, 3327. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      T Uhler, M Kesen, J Henderer, W Steinmann; Glaucoma Screening at Community Senior Centers: Follow-up Assessment . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2002;43(13):3327.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose: To determine the rate of follow-up for glaucoma suspects identified in a community glaucoma screening program. Methods: Three hundred ninety-four, free glaucoma screenings were performed at Philadelphia Corporation for Aging community senior centers from March 2000 through November 2001. Review of the screening records identified forty-two patients whose exam indicated a new diagnosis of either glaucoma or glaucoma suspect and who were therefore referred for further evaluation. Telephone interviews were conducted to assess whether these patients had completed a follow-up eye exam. If no exam was completed, interviewees were queried as to why. Results: Only twenty-three patients (55%) were able to be contacted and interviewed by telephone. The rest could not be contacted despite multiple attempts. Ten (24%) did not remember participating in the screening. Of the thirteen patients who recalled participating, ten (77%) reported that they did have a definitive eye exam as recommended. Two of the three patients who did not have a follow-up exam reported that they did not because of fear of cost. The third reported not believing that the problem was serious. Conclusion: Less than one-fourth of community identified glaucoma suspects were know to have received subsequent evalaution for glaucoma. Overall, follow-up is poor, and the value may be limited for such programs if this is the "usual" expected rate of turnout. Other measures are needed in similar populations to facilitate follow-up if these programs are to be effective.

Keywords: 351 clinical (human) or epidemiologic studies: health care delivery/economics/manpower 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×