December 2002
Volume 43, Issue 13
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   December 2002
Influence of Patient Clinical Data on Cup/Disc Ratio Measurement and Optic Nerve Evaluation for Glaucoma
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • MR Kesen
    Glaucoma Service
    Wills Eye Hospital Philadelphia PA
  • JD Henderer
    Wills Eye Hospital Philadelphia PA
  • W Steinmann
    Center for Clinical Effectiveness and Prevention Tulane Medical Center New Orleans LA
  • J Fontanarosa
    Wills Eye Hospital Philadelphia PA
  • GL SpaethWills Optic nerve Study Group
    Wills Eye Hospital Philadelphia PA
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   M.R. Kesen, None; J.D. Henderer, Merck F; Pharmacia & Upjohn F; W. Steinmann, None; J. Fontanarosa, None; G.L. Spaeth, None.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science December 2002, Vol.43, 3418. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      MR Kesen, JD Henderer, W Steinmann, J Fontanarosa, GL SpaethWills Optic nerve Study Group; Influence of Patient Clinical Data on Cup/Disc Ratio Measurement and Optic Nerve Evaluation for Glaucoma . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2002;43(13):3418.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Abstract: : Purpose: To determine if knowledge of intraocular pressure (IOP), visual field, and other clinical patient information influence clinical evaluation of optic disc for glaucoma. Methods: Sixteen raters independently evaluated 52 stereo disc photos. Three raters were glaucoma specialists, one was a glaucoma fellow, five were ophthalmology residents and seven were medical students. The specialists, fellow and residents recorded their impressions of whether the nerve was glaucomatous and all raters determined the cup/disc ratio. Several days later, the identical slides were shuffled and evaluated twice more. These two readings were accompanied by a set of ancillary patient data that contained information (either correct or incorrect) about the age, IOP and visual field. The observers evaluated the stereo disc photographs in the context of the clinical information that accompanied each pair of photographs. This clinical information was modified so that some cases received the same clinical information while, for other cases, the clinical variables were changed. This allowed for data analysis to test the hypothesis that different clinical information would bias observers' interpretations of optic disc characteristics. Number of exact agreements for nerve impression and number of cup/disc ratio agreement ≤ 0.1 cup/disc ratio were tabulated. Results: For the cup/disc ratio and the nerve interpretation measurement there was a 74% and 32% agreement between the three readings respectively. Estimates of cup/disc size and description of the optic disc as glaucomatous were influenced by clinical information. Conclusion: Clinical data such as IOP, visual field, and age affect the subjective clinical measures of the optic disc. Clinicans who observe the optic disc to evaluate the status of glaucoma should be aware that such observations may be biased by the accompanying information.

Keywords: 498 optic disc • 356 clinical (human) or epidemiologic studies: systems/equipment/techniques 

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.