December 2002
Volume 43, Issue 13
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   December 2002
Mechanical Analysis of a Patient-Operated Tonometer
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • GA Thomas
    New Jersey Institute of Technology Newark NJ
    Physics and Biomedical Eng
  • P Marchetto
    New Jersey Institute of Technology Newark NJ
  • R Greene
    Biomedical Engineering
    New Jersey Institute of Technology Newark NJ
  • R Fechtner
    Ophthalmology University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey Newark NJ
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   G.A. Thomas, None; P. Marchetto, None; R. Greene, None; R. Fechtner, None. Grant Identification: Research to Prevent Blindness
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science December 2002, Vol.43, 3426. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      GA Thomas, P Marchetto, R Greene, R Fechtner; Mechanical Analysis of a Patient-Operated Tonometer . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2002;43(13):3426.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Abstract: : Purpose: We have tested the accuracy and reproducibility of the pressure readings on a set of commercial tonometers (Proview, Bausch and Lomb). We chose this type of tonometer because it is designed to allow a patient to monitor his or her own intra-ocular pressure without anesthesia, and also because it is simple in its construction and appears potentially inexpensive. Methods: We have made measurements of the tonometers in controlled laboratory conditions using a robot arm with micrometer control to eliminate effects related to positioning of the device by the patient. We have measured the true pressure, P, applied to the tonometer using a calibrated, piezo-electric force meter, in place of the patient’s eye. In our initial studies, we have compared P with the nominal pressure readings on the tonometer, Pn, over a range 0<P<40 (mmHg) on 4 tonometers and checked the reproducibility of each. Our working hypothesis was that pressure readings would follow the ideal form P=k*Pn, with the calibration constant, k near a value 1.0, and that we would measure the value of k and its uncertainty dk. Results: We have found that the effective value of k is pressure dependent and roughly 3 to 5 at P below 15 (mmHg) in all of our devices, with the value of dk also pressure dependent and as large as 0.2 in this range of P. At higher pressures, P above 20 (mmHg), the value of k approaches a constant near 1, and the value of dk decreases by about a factor of 10. We interpret the results as indicating that the device acts like a spring moving inside a cylinder with friction, with an offset in the Pn scale and with a non-linearity. The frictional force per unit area, Pf, exerts a force on the spring, leading to irreproducibility. The scale of Pn is shifted by an offset, P0, of about 10 (mmHg), and there is a small non-linearity to the spring of the form, k2*Pn**2., where k2 is a constant. The pressure function is then described by the form: P= Pf +k*(Pn + P0)+ k2*(Pn + P0)**2 . Conclusion: These tonometers may be useful in clinical applications if the practitioner takes into account the functional relationship between the true and nominal pressures and the limitations on reproducibility. Supported in part by RPB, Inc. The Proview tonometers were donated by Bausch and Lomb.

Keywords: 444 intraocular pressure • 356 clinical (human) or epidemiologic studies: systems/equipment/techniques • 359 clinical research methodology 

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.