December 2002
Volume 43, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   December 2002
Association of Visual Field Loss with Measures of Orientation and Mobility: SEE Study
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • KA Turano
    Ophthalmology
    Johns Hopkins University Baltimore MD
  • AT Broman
    Ophthalmology
    Johns Hopkins University Baltimore MD
  • K Bandeen-Roche
    Biostatistics
    Johns Hopkins University Baltimore MD
  • B Munoz
    Ophthalmology
    Johns Hopkins University Baltimore MD
  • GS Rubin
    Institute of Ophthalmology London United Kingdom
  • SK WestSEE Project Team
    Ophthalmology
    Johns Hopkins University Baltimore MD
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   K.A. Turano, None; A.T. Broman, None; K. Bandeen-Roche, None; B. Munoz, None; G.S. Rubin, None; S.K. West, None. Grant Identification: NIH Grant AG16294
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science December 2002, Vol.43, 3828. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      KA Turano, AT Broman, K Bandeen-Roche, B Munoz, GS Rubin, SK WestSEE Project Team; Association of Visual Field Loss with Measures of Orientation and Mobility: SEE Study . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2002;43(13):3828.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose: To determine in a population-based sample of older adults the association between visual field loss and measures of orientation and mobility (O & M) performance and to identify the specific regions of the visual field that are more strongly associated with O & M performance. Methods: A population-based sample of 1505 persons between the ages of 72 - 92 was enrolled in the third round of SEE. Monocular visual fields (60° radius) were tested with the 81-point, single intensity (24 dB) screening test strategy on the Humphrey Field Analyzer. Binocular visual fields were estimated from a combination of the monocular fields. The square root of the number of points missed was calculated for the overall visual field and for 3 non-overlapping regions: central (<= 20°), upper- and lower-peripheral visual fields. Orientation and mobility performance were evaluated by travel time, number of bumps, and number of orientation problems on a circuitous, 32.8-m course seeded with obstacles. Log-linear regressions and linear regressions, adjusting for age, gender, body mass, height, cognitive and general health status, were performed. Results: Loss in the overall visual field was associated with an increase in the number of bumps and travel time. A 25% reduction in the number of points seen in the central visual field was associated with a 1.6-fold increase in the average number of bumps and a 12% increase in average travel time. The same percentage of points missed in the lower peripheral field was associated with a 1.5-fold increase in the average number of bumps and a 10% increase in average travel time. Visual field loss was not associated with orientation problems. Conclusion: In an older population, visual field is significantly associated with mobility performance, with losses in the central and lower-peripheral regions more important than losses in the upper-peripheral field.

Keywords: 309 aging • 355 clinical (human) or epidemiologic studies: risk factor assessment • 624 visual fields 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×