December 2002
Volume 43, Issue 13
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   December 2002
Self-exploration Of The Visual Field After Central Vision Loss Is Enhanced By Kinesthetic Feedback
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • M MacKeben
    Smith-Kettlewell Eye Rsch Inst San Francisco CA
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   M. MacKeben, None. Grant Identification: Support: The Beatrice Brandes Low Vision Fund
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science December 2002, Vol.43, 3849. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      M MacKeben; Self-exploration Of The Visual Field After Central Vision Loss Is Enhanced By Kinesthetic Feedback . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2002;43(13):3849.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Abstract: : Purpose: To intensify and speed up learning of eccentric viewing after binocular central field loss. Methods: Two implementations were devised: The high-tech solution uses a personal computer with custom software and a lightpen. After mapping remaining vision in the macula by a macular mapping test (MMTest, San Francisco), the patient stabilizes gaze by fixating a high contrast angle profile on the screen. Its location is chosen to resemble the candidate quadrant with intact vision according to the mapping test. The field is explored by the patient’s hand moving the lightpen over the field subtended by the angle pattern. Where ever the patient points, a letter of variable size appears above the tip of the lightpen. Thus, the patient can judge in which position of his/her hand the target looks clearest. The low-tech solution uses a cardboard card with the same pattern and letters on small cards with a handle held by the patient. Both methods where used in random order by 34 patients with central scotomas due to a maculopathy. Results: The point with clearest vision was found by all patients using either method in less than 2 minutes. Comparing both methods, absolute locations of these points differed slightly, but the differences were statistically not significant (p≷0.5). Test-retest reliability was high (r≷0.9). The result later helps the patient to reverse the process and adjust gaze relative to a touched letter in a stable position, which is the first step towards using a Preferred Retinal Locus (PRL) for eccentric viewing. Equivalent conventional, examiner-driven methods without kinesthetic feedback proved to be at least 5 times more time-consuming. Conclusion: An inexpensive, easily implemented low-tech method providing patients with immediate kinesthetic feedback regarding hand (and target) position in the visual field can make the first step towards eccentric viewing faster and easier for the patient. A further advantage of the kinesthetic feedback method is that it is independent of verbal communication and can be applied at home.

Keywords: 459 low vision • 308 age-related macular degeneration • 624 visual fields 

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.