December 2002
Volume 43, Issue 13
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   December 2002
Towards a Complete Understanding of Plaid Motion
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • L Bowns
    Psychology University of Nottingham Nottingham United Kingdom
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   L. Bowns, None. Grant Identification: EPSRC GR/N64663/01
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science December 2002, Vol.43, 3869. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      L Bowns; Towards a Complete Understanding of Plaid Motion . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2002;43(13):3869.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Abstract: : Purpose: how do humans combine the velocity information from two moving gratings to detect pattern motion direction. Three previously reported plaid motion effects were investigated with a view to examining the possibility that they could be predicted by a single hypothesis. Methods: three experiments were carried out representing the three effects. All three effects were reproduced using a single two-component moving stimulus where only the speed of one of the components was varied to produce all three effects. In each experiment the stimulus representing one effect only was randomly rotated in the plane so that the stimulus moved in 90 different orientations. Subjects were asked to make a forced choice as to whether the stimulus moved in the same direction or not as an oriented line. The orientation of the line was randomly generated from the predicted direction of one of three different hypotheses: 1. the intersection of constraints rule (Adelson and Movshon, 1982) 2. the vector sum (Yo and Wilson, 1992); and 3. pattern motion predicted by components introduced after squaring the pattern (Derrington et al., 1992; Lu and Sperling, 1995). Results: the method produced very clear results, and facilitated a complete mathematical description of all possible stimulus change showing how only hypothesis 3 'squaring' could account for all of the main results. However, in one of the experiments the results were not completely invariant under rotation, and hypothesis 3 would not predict this. Conclusion: squaring the plaid introduces two very salient components that predict three results not normally attributed to squaring. A different model proposed by Bowns (1999, 2001) also unifies the results without squaring, and includes information corresponding to the two directions reported in the experiment where the results are not invariant to rotation.

Keywords: 477 motion-2D 

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.