December 2002
Volume 43, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   December 2002
Effect of Attention on Motion Integration Capabilities: A Psychophysical Approach
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • JL Hay
    Dept of Psychology University of Aberdeen Aberdeen United Kingdom
  • G Hesselmann
    Institute of Experimental Psychology Heinrich-Heine-University Duesseldorf Germany
  • M Milders
    Dept of Psychology University of Aberdeen Aberdeen United Kingdom
  • M Niedeggen
    Institute of Experimental Psychology Heinrich-Heine-University Duesseldorf Germany
  • A Sahraie
    Dept of Psychology University of Aberdeen Aberdeen United Kingdom
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   J.L. Hay, None; G. Hesselmann, None; M. Milders, None; M. Niedeggen, None; A. Sahraie, None. Grant Identification: Volkswagen Foundation
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science December 2002, Vol.43, 3871. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      JL Hay, G Hesselmann, M Milders, M Niedeggen, A Sahraie; Effect of Attention on Motion Integration Capabilities: A Psychophysical Approach . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2002;43(13):3871.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose:Transient deficits in visual motion perception can be obtained in normal observers if temporal selective attention is required in a rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP). This deficit seems to mimic the sustained motion blindness following lesions in area MT. We have aimed to address whether (a) attention affects motion coherence thresholds and (b) the recovery from transient motion blindness depends on the level of motion integration. Methods: Subjects viewed two synchronised RSVP streams, a local stream defined by a fixation point changing colour every 100 ms, and a global stream consisting of random dots, displaced randomly or coherently. The primary task was to detect the onset of a red fixation colour (T1), which cued the subjects to direct attention to the global stream and to detect the onset of a 100 ms coherent motion episode (T2). In order to determine motion coherence thresholds (Exp.1, n=10), T1 and T2 occurred simultaneously (SOA 0ms), and the coherence of the motion target was varied from 4 to 100%. Differences in the recovery from motion blindness - obtained from SOA 0 to 500ms - were measured for three levels of coherence (30, 45, and 60%, Exp.2, n=15). Results: If the target motion T2 was a unique coherent motion in the global stream, the mean motion coherence threshold was approximately 12%. If T1 and T2 were preceded by irrelevant coherent motion distractors, the detectability of T2 was significantly reduced and the motion coherence thresholds increased to 28%. Similarly, detection of the coherent target motion in the second experiment was more attenuated for smaller (30%) than for larger (60%) coherent motion signal strengths. However, the slope of the attentional recovery function (measured as a function of SOA) did not differ between the levels of target coherence. Conclusion: Comparable to the effect of extrastriate brain lesions, attentional demands can increase the threshold for perceiving motion coherence. The attentional effect on motion integration can be described in terms of a top-down regulation which parallels recent neurophysiological findings.

Keywords: 326 attention • 477 motion-2D 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×