December 2002
Volume 43, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   December 2002
Visual Performance in Photorefractive Keratectomy: One Year and Beyond
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • ED Weichel
    Center for Refractive Surgery Walter Reed Army Medical Center Washington DC
  • KS Bower
    Center for Refractive Surgery Walter Reed Army Medical Center Washington DC
  • E Morgan
    Center for Refractive Surgery Walter Reed Army Medical Center Washington DC
  • J Rabin
    Center for Refractive Surgery Walter Reed Army Medical Center Washington DC
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   E.D. Weichel, None; K.S. Bower, None; E. Morgan, None; J. Rabin, None.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science December 2002, Vol.43, 4149. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      ED Weichel, KS Bower, E Morgan, J Rabin; Visual Performance in Photorefractive Keratectomy: One Year and Beyond . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2002;43(13):4149.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose: The efficacy of refractive surgery typically is based on the level of high contrast visual acuity (VA) achieved and the degree of post-operative, residual refractive error. While decrements in contrast sensitivity (CS) and other measures of visual performance have been demonstrated, these effects are often transient, and not consistently related to visual symptoms. Moreover, information about long-term effects on visual function is lacking. We describe comprehensive measures of visual performance in photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) one year or more after surgery. Methods: Subjects were active duty Army soldiers treated for myopia (-1 to -5D) with a VISX Star excimer laser (6 mm ablation zone) at least one year ago. VA versus contrast (1.25% to 100%) and small letter CS were measured at photopic and mesopic light levels. Glare disability was assessed for mesopic VA (2.5 and 5% contrast) and mesopic small letter CS. Complete spatial and temporal sine-wave CS functions were obtained at photopic and mesopic levels, using a computer-controlled, 2-alternative forced choice system. Results: At 12-18 months after PRK, uncorrected VA for a range of contrasts (2.5%, 10% and 100%) was not significantly different from pre-operative VA with best correction (p≷0.1), despite correction for post-operative magnification effects. Whereas small target CS, and spatial and temporal CS were largely within normal limits, there was considerable inter-subject variability (≷0.2 log units), with some subjects falling below normal levels. In some cases performance decrements were related to higher order aberrations. Conclusion: Comprehensive visual assessment, including target detection and recognition with static and dynamic displays, at normal and reduced luminance, is necessary to fully characterize visual performance in refractive surgery. Further testing is underway to determine how higher order aberrations, pupil size and other factors account for decrements in visual performance detected with this methodology.

Keywords: 544 refractive surgery • 550 refractive surgery: optical quality • 368 contrast sensitivity 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×