December 2002
Volume 43, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   December 2002
Laser Epithelial Keratomileusis Vs Photorefractive Keratectomy: A Confocal Microscopy Study
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • A Ghirlando
    Department of Ophthalmology University of Padova Padova Italy
  • E Moretto
    Department of Ophthalmology University of Padova Padova Italy
  • C Gambato
    Department of Ophthalmology University of Padova Padova Italy
  • E Midena
    Department of Ophthalmology University of Padova Padova Italy
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   A. Ghirlando, None; E. Moretto, None; C. Gambato, None; E. Midena, None.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science December 2002, Vol.43, 4243. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      A Ghirlando, E Moretto, C Gambato, E Midena; Laser Epithelial Keratomileusis Vs Photorefractive Keratectomy: A Confocal Microscopy Study . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2002;43(13):4243.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose:To compare corneal wound healing (epithelial and stromal)- using in vivo confocal microscopy- after laser epithelial keratomileusis (LASEK) vs photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) in myopic eyes. Methods:34 myopic patients were randomized to LASEK in one and PRK in the fellow eye. Treatment was performed in a standard fashion. Uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), postoperative pain and cornel reepithelization were evaluated daily for 4 days, and then monthly. Corneal confocal microscopy was performed at each follow up examination to quantify epithelial and stromal wound healing process. Patients and examiners were masked about treatment procedure. Results:Mean pre-op vs post-op refractive errors were: LASEK eyes: -3.95 1.29 D vs + 0.22 0.79 D (p= .005); PRK eyes: -4.37 1.35 D vs - 0.37 0.61 D (p=.008). Refractive results, UCVA, BCVA, and corneal reepithelization were not significantly different in the two treatment groups during follow-up. Pain score was significantly (p=.02) higher in LASEK vs PRK treated eyes. At confocal microscopy, no morphologic difference was observed in LASEK vs PRK treated eyes in the early post-op follow-up; at one month and thereafter, LASEK treated eyes had significantly less activated keratocytes (p=.005) and stromal extracellular matrix (p=.009) compared to PRK eyes. Conclusion:LASEK seems to modulate corneal wound healing process, reducing stromal corneal responses to excimer laser photoablation when compared to standard PRK.

Keywords: 471 microscopy: confocal/tunneling • 631 wound healing • 374 cornea: stroma and keratocytes 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×