December 2002
Volume 43, Issue 13
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   December 2002
Intravenous Versus Intravenous Antibiotics for the Prophylaxis of Postraumatic Endophthalmitis
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • MP Blair
    Ophthalmology Wilmer Eye Institute Baltimore MD
  • J Pearlman
    Ophthalmology Wilmer Eye Institute Baltimore MD
  • JB Harlan
    Ophthalmology Wilmer Eye Institute Baltimore MD
  • M Siler
    Nursing Administration Johns Hopkins University Baltimore MD
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   M.P. Blair, None; J. Pearlman, None; J.B. Harlan, None; M. Siler, None.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science December 2002, Vol.43, 4446. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      MP Blair, J Pearlman, JB Harlan, M Siler; Intravenous Versus Intravenous Antibiotics for the Prophylaxis of Postraumatic Endophthalmitis . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2002;43(13):4446.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Abstract: : Purpose: To determine whether the choice of antibiotic prophylaxis of post-traumatic endophthalmitis by either intravitreal or intravenous administration affects length of hospital stay, cost of therapy, visual outcome, or rate of development of endophthalmitis. Methods: After obtaining Institutional Review Board approval, a retrospective chart review study was performed to evaluate the effect of administration route on outcomes, including visual acuity at last visit, change in visual acuity from presentation, development of endophthalmitis, length of hospital stay, and cost of treatment. Injuries were stratified according to type, grade, pupil status, and zone, following Pieramici et al (American Journal of Ophthalmology 123:820-831, 1997). Results: Ninety-four patients were treated with intravenous antibiotics, while 28 were treated with intravitreal antibiotics. Preliminary results indicate that with intravitreal antibiotics the mean length of stay decreased from 2.7 days to 2.15 days. Median total charges decreased from $4,926 to $4,561 with intravitreal antibiotics. However, neither of these differences was statistically significant. Preliminary data on visual outcome and development of endophthalmitis also show no statistical difference between routes of administration. Conclusion: Intravitreal administration of antibiotics achieves similar visual outcomes to intravenous administration in the prophylaxis of post-traumatic endophthalmitis. This method of administration also may decrease length of hospital stay and costs, although this was not demonstrated with statistical significance in this relatively small retrospective study.

Keywords: 398 endophthalmitis • 608 trauma • 319 antibiotics/antifungals/antiparasitics 

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.