December 2002
Volume 43, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   December 2002
Explantation of Tack Fixated EPIRETINAL Microcontact Foils in Rabbits - Preliminary Observations
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • H Berk
    Dept of Ophthalmology University of Cologne Cologne Germany
  • S Held
    Dept of Ophthalmology University of Cologne Cologne Germany
  • N Alteheld
    Dept of Ophthalmology University of Cologne Cologne Germany
  • R Shojaei
    Dept of Ophthalmology University of Cologne Cologne Germany
  • MA Vobig
    Dept of Ophthalmology University of Cologne Cologne Germany
  • G Marzella
    Dept of Ophthalmology University of Cologne Cologne Germany
  • P Walter
    Dept of Ophthalmology University of Cologne Cologne Germany
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   H. Berk, None; S. Held, None; N. Alteheld, None; R. Shojaei, None; M.A. Vobig, None; G. Marzella, None; P. Walter, None. Grant Identification: BMBF grant 01KP004, Köln Fortune
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science December 2002, Vol.43, 4456. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      H Berk, S Held, N Alteheld, R Shojaei, MA Vobig, G Marzella, P Walter; Explantation of Tack Fixated EPIRETINAL Microcontact Foils in Rabbits - Preliminary Observations . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2002;43(13):4456.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose: To determine if explantation of epiretinally implanted and tack fixated microcontact foils as a part of a retinal prosthesis is feasible in rabbits. Methods: After vitrectomy microcontact foils were fixated onto the visual streak by a retinal tack in six rabbits. With an interval between 4 to 12 weeks later the implants and the tack were explanted. Explantation consisted of epiretinal membrane peeling, tack mobilization, retinotomy, tack and implant removal, PFCL, endolaser, and tamponade with silicone oil or air. During a follow-up of three months the animals were examined by means of ERG, VEP, and ophthalmoscopy. Results: Implantation and tack fiation was successful in 5/6 cases. In one case a total retinal detachment was observed due to PVR. The explant procedure will be demonstrated. Although extensive vitreoretinal manipulations were necessary to remove the implant, the procedure seemed to be feasible and comparable to the removal of intraretinal foreign bodies. In four cases the eye was filled with silicone oil, in one case we used air due to a very limited retinal trauma. In two cases we observed a total retinal detachment due to PVR after explantation due to large retinal defects. In the other three eyes the retina remained attached. In this series of experiments it was not possible to preserve the retinal area under the microcontacts due to the strong adherence between the implant and the retinal surface, which could also be demonstrated by REM studies of the explant. Conclusion: Explantation of tack fixated microcontact foils seemed surgically to be feasible. The functional and anatomical outcome was strongly associated with the size of the retinal defect induced by the explantation procedure.

Keywords: 554 retina • 394 electrophysiology: non-clinical • 565 retinal glia 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×