December 2002
Volume 43, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   December 2002
Electrical Stimulation of Normal and Retinal Degenerate (rd) Isolated Mouse Retina
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • TM O'Hearn
    Ophthalmology Wilmer Eye Inst/Johns Hopkins Uni Baltimore MD
  • JD Weiland
    Ophthalmology Doheny Eye Inst/USC Los Angeles CA
  • MS Humayun
    Ophthalmology Doheny Eye Inst/USC Los Angeles CA
  • M Maia
    Ophthalmology Wilmer Eye Inst/Johns Hopkins Uni Baltimore MD
  • E Margalit
    Ophthalmology Wilmer Eye Inst/Johns Hopkins Uni Baltimore MD
  • SR Sadda
    Ophthalmology Wilmer Eye Inst/Johns Hopkins Uni Baltimore MD
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   T.M. O'Hearn, None; J.D. Weiland, None; M.S. Humayun, None; M. Maia, None; E. Margalit, None; S.R. Sadda, None. Grant Identification: Foundation for Fighting Blindness
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science December 2002, Vol.43, 4467. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      TM O'Hearn, JD Weiland, MS Humayun, M Maia, E Margalit, SR Sadda; Electrical Stimulation of Normal and Retinal Degenerate (rd) Isolated Mouse Retina . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2002;43(13):4467.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose: Fundamental to the effort to build an effective visual prosthesis is an understanding of the most efficient parameters for stimulation of retinal neurons. Using ganglion cell recordings, stimulus threshold and response latency were studied in both normal and retinal degenerate (rd) isolated mouse retina, along with the effect of altering the site of stimulus delivery on these parameters. Methods: Twenty retinas each were isolated from either normal or rd mice for stimulation. Electrical stimulation was delivered via two 125 µm macroelectrodes positioned at either the photoreceptor (PR) or ganglion cell (GGL) surface. A cathodic first, charge balanced, biphasic, square wave stimulus with a phase duration of 1mS and a 3mS interphase delay was used for all stimulation cycles. Recording of induced responses was performed using penetrating tungsten wire microelectrodes positioned in the ganglion cell layer. Results: Stimulation of the ganglion cell side in normal retina yielded a significantly (P<0.05) lower mean threshold (30.04 µA/ 77.26 µA) and latency (2.11 mS/ 2.77 mS) when compared to similar stimulation of the photoreceptor side in normal retina. The latency of the ganglion cell side stimulation also proved to be significantly lower (P<0.05) than the latency for stimulation of the ganglion cell side in RD retina. (2.11 mS/ 2.69 mS) No other statistically significant differences were observed amongst the other subgroups. Conclusion: Stimulation of normal retina yields lower thresholds and latencies when the electrodes are placed on the ganglion cell side versus the photoreceptor side. This relationship is not seen in the stimulation of RD retina. Stimulation of the ganglion cell side of RD retina also had a higher latency and tended to have a higher threshold than ganglion side stimulation in normal retina.

Keywords: 554 retina • 394 electrophysiology: non-clinical • 316 animal model 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×