December 2002
Volume 43, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   December 2002
Visual and Electrical Evoked Response (VER, EER) Recorded From Subdural or Epidural Electrodes Implanted Above the Visual Cortex in Normal Dogs Under Two Methods of Anesthesia
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • E Margalit
    Ophthalmology Wilmer Eye Institute Baltimore MD
  • JD Weiland
    Ophthalmology Doheny Eye Institute Los Angeles CA
  • R Clatterbuck
    Neurosurgery Johns Hopkins Hospital Baltimore MD
  • GY Fujii
    Ophthalmology Doheny Eye Institute Los Angeles CA
  • M Maia
    Ophthalmology Wilmer Eye Institute Baltimore MD
  • G Torres
    Ophthalmology Wilmer Eye Institute Baltimore MD
  • SA D'anna
    Ophthalmology Wilmer Eye Institute Baltimore MD
  • DV Piyathaisere
    Ophthalmology Wilmer Eye Institute Baltimore MD
  • M Tameesh
    Ophthalmology Doheny Eye Institute Los Angeles CA
  • MS Humayun
    Ophthalmology Doheny Eye Institute Los Angeles CA
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   E. Margalit, None; J.D. Weiland, None; R. Clatterbuck, None; G.Y. Fujii, None; M. Maia, None; G. Torres, None; S.A. D'anna, None; D.V. Piyathaisere, None; M. Tameesh, None; M.S. Humayun, None. Grant Identification: NEI Grant R209EY11888
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science December 2002, Vol.43, 4487. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      E Margalit, JD Weiland, R Clatterbuck, GY Fujii, M Maia, G Torres, SA D'anna, DV Piyathaisere, M Tameesh, MS Humayun; Visual and Electrical Evoked Response (VER, EER) Recorded From Subdural or Epidural Electrodes Implanted Above the Visual Cortex in Normal Dogs Under Two Methods of Anesthesia . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2002;43(13):4487.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Abstract: : Purpose:To compare electrical or visual elicited cortical responses in normal dogs implanted with subdural or epidural electrodes with two methods of anesthesia. Methods:Mixed bread dogs (5 eyes, 1-2 years old) were used in this study. Under general anesthesia (Halothane 2-3 %), a chronic subdural electrode array or several acute epidural electrodes (Ad-Tech, Racine WI) were implanted over the visual cortex. The location of the array was confirmed by X-ray after the operation and 8 weeks later. Experiments began 1 week after the operation. Methods of anesthesia induction used were either Halothane 2.5-3.0% or Propofol 2-3 mg/kg/Fentanyl 5-7 mg/kg. The dog was then intubated and ventilation was controlled. Both methods included the usage of a muscle relaxant Pancuronium 0.1 mg/kg. Anesthesia was maintained with either Halothane 1-1.5 % or propofol 100-150 mg/kg/min/Fentanyl 2-3 mg/kg. Bright flash stimuli for visual evoked responses (VER) were given by a white LED stimulator (Mayo Co. Nagoya, Japan). Electrical stimulus was applied with either a Burian-Allen contact lens or an intraocular probe. All experiments were performed under the guidelines of Johns Hopkins University for animal experimentation. Results:Electrically or visually elicited cortical responses were similar under the two methods of anesthesia used. The mean VER and EER (Burian-Allen) amplitude and latency (for 1ms 4mA stimulus) recorded under Halothane were 34mV/ 58ms and 30mV/ 45ms respectively. The mean VER and EER recorded under Propofol/Fentanyl were 32mV/ 55ms and 28mV/ 47ms respectively. The EER from intraocular stimulation with 2 mA of current had comparable amplitudes and latencies to extraocular stimulation. Conclusion:Subdural electrodes can effectively record VER and EER under general anesthesia. VER and EER have similar amplitudes and latencies when using both methods of general anesthesia. Subdural recording of EER is a sensitive method and may serve as a measuring tool to the efficacy and safety of an intraocular epiretinal prosthesis.

Keywords: 393 electrophysiology: clinical • 621 visual cortex • 562 retinal degenerations: hereditary 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×