December 2002
Volume 43, Issue 13
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   December 2002
Flanker Size Affects Visual Lateral Interactions
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • AK Nugent
    Schepens Eye Res Inst Harvard Medical School Boston MA
  • RL Woods
    Schepens Eye Res Inst Harvard Medical School Boston MA
  • E Peli
    Schepens Eye Res Inst Harvard Medical School Boston MA
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   A.K. Nugent, None; R.L. Woods, None; E. Peli, None. Grant Identification: NIH EY05957 and EY12890
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science December 2002, Vol.43, 4718. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      AK Nugent, RL Woods, E Peli; Flanker Size Affects Visual Lateral Interactions . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2002;43(13):4718.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Abstract: : Purpose: Polat and Sagi (1993, 1994) showed that laterally displaced masks (flankers) could facilitate contrast detection of gabor patches, independent of the size of the patches. However, when spatial scaling of these flanker effects was demonstrated, stimulus bandwidth was confounded with spatial frequency. In a previous study (Woods et al., in press), we varied the bandwidth (Gabor patch size from σ = 0.5λ to 1.5λ) of flanker and test stimulus simultaneously and showed that bandwidth affected facilitation. However, since we altered stimulus and flanker bandwidth simultaneously, it is possible that the effects were not a consequence of bandwidth alone. The results may have been influenced by the greater overlap of the test stimulus and flankers when the patches were larger (masking). To examine this confound we varied the vertical and horizontal size, separately, of the flankers while keeping the size of the test stimulus fixed. Methods: In the first experiment, the height of the flankers was varied from σy = 0.5λ to 3λ. In the second experiment, the width of the flankers was varied from σx = 0.125λ to 2λ. In both experiments, test to flanker distance was 3λ. All conditions were tested at 2, 4, and 8 cycles/degree. Three subjects in each experiment were tested in a 2AFC paradigm. Results: With flanker heights σy = 0.5λ to 1.5λ (no overlap with test patch) facilitation was about equal. As the flankers began to overlap the test stimulus (σy = 2λ to 3λ) detection contrast thresholds increased dramatically. When flanker width was varied, maximum facilitation was found at σx = 0.75λ and facilitation decreased as flanker width increased. All these effects were more pronounced at the lower spatial frequency (2 cycles/degree). Conclusion: Masking was a major component of the effects found in our previous study, as illustrated by the effects of flanker height. However, there was a bandwidth component, such that a smaller bandwidth (i.e. a wider flanker) decreased facilitation. This is not consistent with simple additive rules that could be derived from the results of previous studies. These results need to be reconciled with proposed models of lateral interactions.

Keywords: 586 spatial vision • 368 contrast sensitivity • 579 shape, form, contour, object perception 

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.