The demographic data of all of the subjects are shown in
Table 1. Forty-seven males (mean age, 39.3 ± 15.6 years) and 56 females (mean age, 42.1 ± 18.7 years) were examined. No significant differences were observed between the groups in the ocular and systemic parameters, except for SBP, which was significantly higher in the male group than in the female group (
P = 0.044).
Table 2 shows the linear single regression results. The various parameters, in particular, the ONH-MBR in the overall area, were correlated with sex (
r = −0.402,
P < 0.001). Although the MBRs in the vessel and tissue areas on the ONH were significantly different between the male group and the female group (
P < 0.01,
P < 0.001, respectively), similar to the MBR in the overall area of the ONH, the difference in the latter was most significant. Accordingly, only the MBR in the overall area on the ONH was used for multiple regression analysis and the pulse waveform analysis in this study. In all, five ONH pulse waveform parameters were correlated with sex (
Table 2). In particular, BOS (
r = 0.394,
P < 0.001); FAI (
r = −0.345,
P < 0.001); ATI (
r = −0.387,
P < 0.001); and resistivity index (
r = −0.393,
P < 0.001) were strongly correlated with sex.
The mean blur rates of the overall area on the ONH (r = −0.257, P < 0.001) and choroid (r = −0.299, P < 0.001) were correlated with age. In addition, six of the ONH pulse waveform parameters were correlated with age. Particularly, the BOS (r = −0.426, P < 0.001), BOT (r = −0.549, P < 0.001), falling rate (r = 0.527, P < 0.001), ATI (r = 0.532, P < 0.001), and resistivity index (r = 0.406, P < 0.001) were strongly correlated with age. The parameters of the pulse waveform analysis also correlated with the circulation factors (e.g., BP and heart rate [HR]), but none were correlated with IOP or subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT).
The multiple stepwise regression analysis revealed that sex (
β = 0.389,
P < 0.001) and age (
β = −0.290,
P = 0.002) were independent factors indicating the ONH-MBR (
Table 3), and that age (
β = −0.394,
P < 0.001) and SFCT (
β = 0.221,
P = 0.016) were independent factors indicating choroidal MBR (
Table 4).
Table 5 shows only the significant independent factors indicating each ONH pulse waveform parameter in the stepwise multiple regression analysis. The analysis revealed that heart rate (
β = −0.461,
P < 0.001) and age (
β = 0.249,
P = 0.005) were independent factors indicating skew, and that age (
β = −0.514,
P < 0.001); MAP (
β = 0.321,
P < 0.001); sex (
β = −0.296,
P < 0.001); and heart rate (
β = 0.275,
P = 0.001) were independent factors indicating the BOS. The analysis also determined that age (
β = −0.550,
P < 0.001) and heart rate (
β = 0.210,
P = 0.012) were independent factors indicating the BOT, that heart rate (
β = −0.461,
P < 0.001) and sex (
β = 0.249,
P < 0.001) were independent factors indicating the rising rate, and that age (
β = −0.461,
P < 0.001) was an independent factor indicating the falling rate. The regression also found that MAP (
β = −0.440,
P < 0.001); sex (
β = 0.220,
P = 0.011); age (
β = −0.183,
P = 0.038); and heart rate (
β = 0.179,
P = 0.039) were independent factors indicating the FAI, that age (
β = 0.432,
P < 0.001); sex (
β = 0.416,
P < 0.001); heart rate (
β = 0.224,
P = 0.001); and MAP (
β = 0.204,
P = 0.006) were independent factors indicating the ATI, and that age (
β = 0.494,
P < 0.001); MAP (
β = −0.314,
P < 0.001); heart rate (
β = −0.342,
P < 0.001); and sex (
β = 0.306,
P < 0.001) were independent factors indicating the resistivity index.
Figure 3 demonstrates that the intercept of the regression line of the MBR in the older age group (>45 years) was steeper than that in the younger age group (≤45 years) in the female group (A), and the intercept of the regression line of the MBR was very similar between the males and females in the older age group (>45 years; [B]).
Figure 4 shows that the MBR on the ONH in the female group was significantly higher than that in the male group (
P < 0.001), though there were no differences in the choroid between the groups (
P > 0.05).
Figure 5 shows that the BOS was significantly higher in the male group than in the female group (
P < 0.001). The rising rate (
P = 0.016), the FAI (
P < 0.001), the ATI (
P < 0.001) and the resistivity index (
P < 0.001) were significantly higher in the female group than in the male group.