These data suggest that absorption of riboflavin into the corneal stroma is significantly reduced in current commercial transepithelial CXL protocols in comparison with epithelium-off CXL.
Since most tissue cross-linking is thought to take place in the anterior cornea,
20 determining the availability of key photochemical ingredients (riboflavin, UV light, oxygen) at specific depths may add useful additional information. The method we describe above provides these depth-specific measurements of riboflavin, with the microscope objective and image size determining the resolution available. An additional advantage of our technique is the ability to quantify riboflavin concentration within the epithelium, which, as our results demonstrate, exceeds that in the underlying stroma. In clinical practice, the consequences of loading the corneal epithelium with riboflavin in transepithelial CXL could include epithelial toxicity and UV light shielding. The normal epithelium filters out an average 20% of UVA light radiation passing through the cornea.
20 This UV light attenuation is increased by riboflavin absorption within the epithelium in transepithelial CXL. Enhanced UV absorption with free radical generation within the epithelium could result in “arc eye”-type epithelial toxicity. Epithelial defects are commonly observed on day 1 after transepithelial CXL using currently available protocols,
21 and punctate epitheliopathy is evident in all cases (O'Brart D, oral communication, 2015).
The inability to measure concentration at specific depths in the epithelium and stroma is a significant limitation of HPLC. Furthermore, unless this riboflavin-rich epithelium is specifically removed prior to dissolving the sample, the concentration result will be inappropriately increased. This may have contributed to the observations described by Ostacolo et al.
11 in a study in which Ribocross TE was tested using modified Franz-type diffusion cells with freshly excised porcine corneas (both with and without epithelium). After 40 minutes, riboflavin accumulation through an intact epithelium (0.394 ± 0.02 nmol/mg) matched that achieved epithelium-off (0.396 ± 0.03 nmol/mg). This contrasts with our results showing that Ribocross TE performed poorly compared to other protocols tested. As demonstrated in
Figures 4 and
5, we observed TFP signals within the epithelium to be higher than in the underlying stroma in all tested protocols. Furthermore, the precorneal film of riboflavin solution exhibited even higher fluorescence signal. Dissolving a full-thickness specimen, including a riboflavin-loaded epithelium and precorneal film, will lead to overestimation of corneal stromal riboflavin concentrations by HPLC. This may explain why Ostacolo et al.
11 recorded only a 4-fold reduction in stromal concentration when their control riboflavin solution (i.e., no vitamin E) was applied to an intact epithelium, compared with epithelium-off application (0.098 ± 0.04 nmol/mg epithelium-on; 0.396 ± 0.03 nmol/mg epithelium-off). Cassagne et al.
12 also used HPLC in an in vivo rabbit eye study of iontophoresis, testing both the dissolved cornea and aqueous sample. Again, the investigators did not remove the epithelium prior to analysis. This may, in part, explain the discrepancy in their results showing 45% less riboflavin in corneas treated using iontophoresis (compared to epithelium-off controls), but 95% less riboflavin in the aqueous of iontophoresis-treated eyes.
There are a number of limitations to this study. Firstly, results in ex vivo rabbit corneas, although a better anatomical match to human corneal epithelial thickness than porcine eyes, may be affected by postmortem changes in epithelial layer integrity. Measures taken to minimize this compromise included a short postmortem interval, immersion in chilled PBS immediately post mortem, and warming to physiological temperature prior to preparation of corneas for experimentation. We observed no obvious stromal swelling (indicative of endothelial pump failure) in negative controls, with similar mean corneal thicknesses to those published for rabbit corneas in vivo (400 μm).
22 Despite this, some epithelial degradation and enhanced permeability are likely, and our results may overestimate stromal riboflavin absorption in clinical transepithelial CXL. Secondly, migration of riboflavin within the snap-frozen tissue would have started as soon as the section thawed on the slide. Even with the cryostat next to the microscope, there was still a delay of up to a minute before image acquisition. This would tend to result in an underestimation of stromal riboflavin concentrations. Finally, imaging through two media of different refractive indices (oil and water either side of the coverslip) may have increased optical aberrations as the laser light passed through. We chose oil to ensure that no (water soluble) riboflavin leaked out of the tissue. When we tried to embed excised corneas in optimal cutting temperature (OCT) compound we observed very prompt dye leakage once thawed on the slide (data not shown). This may have impacted the study of Cassagne et al.
12 For lack of an appropriate oil-immersion objective, we placed a coverslip on top and used a water-immersion objective. Any induced aberrations may have resulted in a small absolute loss of signal, but since this same method was employed for all imaged samples, no relative drop between samples should have been present.
Notwithstanding the above laboratory studies, results from preliminary clinical case series using noniontophoretic transepithelial riboflavin preparations have been equivocal, with some showing similar efficacy to epithelium-off CXL,
23,24 while most have demonstrated less pronounced effects.
6,25–28 Twelve-month results from one recently published randomized controlled trial
6 concluded that transepithelial CXL using Ricrolin TE (Sooft Italia S.p.A.) was not effective at stabilizing corneal shape compared with epithelium-off treatment. For iontophoresis, up to 15-month follow-up data have been published, with reported cessation of disease progression and improvements in keratometric and visual parameters.
7–9 The longer-term relative efficacy of all these transepithelial techniques compared to epithelium-off CXL remains unknown.
In conclusion, the methodology described above provides a quantitative means of measuring riboflavin across the whole cornea in an ex vivo model. We present evidence that the corneal epithelium represents a significant barrier to riboflavin absorption into the stroma. Existing commercial transepithelial CXL protocols load the corneal epithelium with riboflavin and achieve relatively low riboflavin concentrations in the anterior corneal stroma when compared to epithelium-off CXL. Although a key rate-limiting step, the absolute stromal concentration of riboflavin required for effective CXL is not known. Without further evidence, the concentration achieved “epithelium-off” remains the gold standard. The differences in transepithelial absorption demonstrated above may yield different degrees of tissue cross-linking and are, therefore, likely to be clinically significant. The method described above may prove useful in testing candidate protocols prior to future clinical trials.