Our data pertaining to a role for IL-18 in regulating neovascularization was supported by independent reports in the literature,
10,11 and strongly indicated that IL-18 could have some therapeutic benefit in neovascular AMD, in contrast to a report by Ambati et al.
12 Human IL-18 (SB-485232, GSK) is a clinically enabled investigational drug that has been injected systemically in >170 cancer patients with an excellent safety profile, with numerous on-going studies.
13,14 We sought to examine the tolerability and efficacy of SB-485232 in a nonhuman primate model of neovascular AMD. Human IL-18 has been reported to have bioactivity in cynomolgus monkeys.
15 The laser-induced CNV model in nonhuman primates is a well-established robust model for screening therapeutic efficacy of drugs directed at neovascular AMD, albeit most of these studies have directly targeted the VEGF pathway.
15 Monkeys were injected intravitreally (IVT) with IL-18 (0.01, 0.2, 1, 2.5, and 10 μg) post induction of laser lesions and FFA was performed on days 8, 15, and 22 (
Fig. 3A). Following Bayesian analysis, the estimated probabilities for the existence of a dose-dependent, linear reduction in grade IV lesion counts (those which most likely resemble human neovascular AMD lesions) were 0.77, 0.97 and 0.9 for days 8, 15, and 22, respectively. In short, the data indicate that there is a 77%, 97%, and 90% probability that IL-18 is inducing a dose-dependent reduction in grade IV lesion counts when compared with vehicle control at days 8, 15, and 22 post laser. In
Figure 3B, the horizontal red line in the plot depicts the estimated number of grade IV lesions in vehicle injected eyes and the prior historical controls for vehicle-treated eyes at the laboratory conducting these studies, and the horizontal green line depicts worst case scenario (one lesion as grade IV) observed in eyes injected with Lucentis (
Fig. 3B). In contrast, the Bayesian assessment of whether the IL-18 data would be equivalent to the worst-case scenario of the Lucentis treatment indicated a low chance for IL-18 being similar to the worst case scenario for Lucentis with a 51%, 16%, and 17% chance for the 8, 15, and 22 days, respectively. Overall, the data demonstrate very clear IL-18 activity in reducing leakage from grade IV lesions, but this activity is not as pronounced as that of Lucentis. An interesting observation is the fact that the 10-μg dose appeared to be less efficacious than the 1- and 2.5-μg/eye doses. Interleukin 18 is approximately 95% homologous with the cynomolgus protein and, hence, is immunogenic in cynomolgus monkeys.
16 The apparent reduced efficacy of the 10-μg dose when compared with lower doses may likely be due to this response which effectively neutralizes the bioactivity of IL-18. In addition, in flatmounts stained for F-actin, RPE cells appeared to maintain their honeycomb structure with no evidence of cellular dysmorphia observed at any dose or any time point post IVT injection of IL-18 (
Fig. 4A). Furthermore, postmortem analysis of nonlasered ocular tissues 15 days post injection showed no toxic effect to either the retina or RPE, with no apoptotic (blebbing cells) or necrotic (swollen cells) phenotypes evident in any cell type at any dose (1, 3 or 10 μg IL-18;
Figs. 4B–D). Additionally, histopathologic assessment of cynomolgus monkey retinal sections was carried out 15 days post IVT injection of IL-18 (1000, 3000, and 10,000 ng) and with no abnormal findings reported (
Fig. 4E). Pharmacokinetic plasma analysis of IL-18 showed detectable and dose-proportional levels of IL-18 up to and including 7 days post IVT injection in all animals injected with the 10-μg dose of IL-18 (
Supplementary Figs. S1, S2).