In 420 eyes of 210 OAG patients, eyes were excluded for the following reasons: poor quality EDI-OCT images (n = 64), difficulty in classifying optic disc appearance into one phenotype (n = 56), and difficulty in measuring LC depth in a reproducible manner owing to a downward LC insertion (n = 3). Both eyes were eligible in 107 patients, and one eye for each patient was randomly selected. One eye was eligible in 73 patients. Thus, 180 OAG eyes were included. Of the 66 normal subjects recruited, 59 eyes were included as controls.
Agreement on the masked evaluation of the optic disc photographs in the diagnosis of normal and glaucoma eyes between observers was 0.962 (95% CI = 0.930–0.983). Agreement on the categorization of the glaucomatous disc appearances between observers was 0.969 (95% CI = 0.943–0.985). The reproducibility of the LC depth measurements was determined. For the mean LC depth relative to the BMO, the ICC 1 was 0.988 for observer 1 and 0.992 for observer 2, and the ICC 2 was 0.976 with a 95% CI of 0.962 to 0.988. For the maximum LC depth relative to the BMO, the ICC 1 was 0.990 for observer 1 and 0.987 for observer 2, and the ICC 2 was 0.978 with a 95% CI of 0.959 to 0.994. For the mean LC depth relative to the AS, the ICC 1 was 0.975 for observer 1 and 0.981 for observer 2, and the ICC 2 was 0.974 with a 95% CI of 0.959 to 0.990. For the maximum LC depth relative to the AS, the ICC 1 was 0.978 for observer 1 and 0.977 for observer 2, and the ICC 2 was 0.972 with a 95% CI of 0.959 to 0.986. The P values for all of the reproducibility data were <0.001.
There were no differences in sex proportion or age between the normal and the OAG group, while the refractive error was greater for the OAG group (
P < 0.0001,
Table 1). There were no differences in IOP among the groups on the day of OCT imaging. Mean deviation (MD) of the Humphrey VF test of OAG eyes was −8.38 ± 7.16 dB. The mean and maximum LC depths relative to both the BMO and the AS reference planes were significantly greater in the OAG group than in the normal group (all
P < 0.0001,
Table 1). The statistical significance remained after adjusting for sex, age, refractive error, IOP, and MD.
Among 180 OAG eyes, the optic discs of 56 were classified as FI, 30 as GE, 69 as MY, and 25 as SS (
Table 1). The sex proportion did not differ among phenotypes, though there was a significant difference in age. Patients of the FI group were older than those of the MY group (
P < 0.0001), and patients of the SS group were older than those of the GE and MY groups (
P = 0.0074 and
P < 0.0001, respectively). The MY group had a greater refractive error than the other disc groups (all
P < 0.0001). There were significant differences in the IOP among groups both before treatment and on the day of OCT imaging (
P < 0.0001 and
P = 0.0024, respectively;
Table 1). The GE group had higher IOP before treatment than the other disc groups (all
P < 0.0001). The IOP on the day of OCT imaging was higher in the GE group than in the MY group (
P = 0.0031), while it was not different from that in the FI and SS groups. The VF damage, evaluated as the MD of the Humphrey VF test, did not differ among phenotypes. There were significant differences in mean and maximum LC depths relative to both the BMO and AS reference planes within phenotypes (all
P < 0.0001,
Table 1). The significance remained after adjusting for sex, age, refractive error, IOP, and MD.
Comparison of the LC depth relative to the AS reference plane among the normal and four glaucoma optic disc phenotypes showed that all of the glaucoma disc groups had greater mean and maximum LC depths than did the normal group, except for the SS group (
Fig. 3). There was no significant difference in the LC depth between the SS group and the normal group. Among the four glaucomatous phenotypes, the GE group had greater mean and maximum LC depths than other phenotypes (all
P < 0.001,
Fig. 3), while the SS group had a smaller depth than others (all
P < 0.05,
Fig. 3). The results of the LC depth comparison among groups, using the BMO reference, were compatible with those with the AS reference (data not shown).
There was a wide range of overlap of the LC depth between the normal group and the SS group (
Table 2). The proportion of the eyes in which the mean and maximum LC depths fell into the 95% CI of normal group was higher in the SS group than in the FI and GE group (24.0% for SS, 5.4% for FI, and 0% for GE in the mean LC depth; and 20.0% for SS, 1.8% for FI, and 0% for GE in the maximum LC depth; all
P < 0.05;
Table 2). The GE group had little overlap with other disc groups because of its greater LC depth. In only one GE eye (3.3%) did the mean and maximum LC depths overlap with the FI group (
Table 2).