The geometrical parameters (
Fig. 7) and GRIN profiles (
Fig. 8) extracted from untreated (5-hour/15-hour cultured), 5-hour HBN/HBO lenses, and 15-hour HBN/HBO lenses were implemented in ZEMAX to calculate the lens optical power (
Fig. 9A). Consistent with our findings of a trend toward a thinner lens (
Fig. 7B) and significantly decreased GRIN profile in the core (
Fig. 8D) of lenses exposed to 15 hours of HBO, a significant reduction of optical power was apparent only in the 15-hour HBO treatment group (
Fig. 9A). To assess how changes in the GRIN and geometry induced by culturing lenses in HBO for 15 hours specifically affects overall vision quality, we used an anatomically accurate ZEMAX model of the bovine eye created in an earlier study.
16 Model simulations were initially performed to calculate the optimal focal length of the model eye. In these simulations, the vitreous chamber length (V
T = 12.8 mm) was allowed to vary between the different conditions to determine the focal length of the model eye that provides the optimal focus. Using this approach, it is apparent that untreated and HBN-treated lenses cultured for up to 15 hours and HBO-treated lenses cultured for 5 hours have optimal focal lengths that are not significantly different from the vitreous chamber length (12.8 mm) measured in the bovine eye (
Fig. 9B). However, 15-hour HBO lenses exhibited a significant increase in the optimal focal length that would result in images being focused behind the retina, indicating that exposure to HBO is causing a hyperopic shift. In addition to measurements of optical power, the ZEMAX software also quantifies the Seidel aberrations (coma, astigmatism, distortion, field curvature, longitudinal chromatic, and transverse chromatic) that are associated with the passage of light through an optical system. We found no significant changes in estimated Seidel aberration levels in the lenses of each of the different groups, including the 15-hour HBO–treated lenses (data not shown), which is consistent with the clarity of these lenses observed in
Figure 1. Finally, to visually assess what effects the changes in lens optical power have on overall image quality of the bovine eye, we used the Image Simulation capability of ZEMAX to determine the ability of the model eye to reproduce an input image (
Fig. 9C). This analysis was performed using either the calculated optimal focal length (17.5 mm) for the model eye, or a fixed focal length given by the vitreous chamber depth (12.8 mm), which more closely represents the situation in the in vivo bovine eye. Analysis performed using the calculated optimal focal length showed that image quality is unaffected for the different lens groups (
Fig. 9C, left column). However, the same analysis performed using the vitreous chamber depth as a “fixed” focal length for each group revealed a blurring of the image for lenses exposed to HBO for 15 hours (
Fig. 9C, right column), consistent with the observed hyperopic shift in this treatment group (
Fig. 9B). Overall, this confirms that the nature of the 15-hour HBO–induced optical deficiency was a hyperopic shift.