Uveal melanoma (UM) is the most common primary intraocular tumor in adults with an incidence in the United States of approximately four cases per million people per year.
7 About half of the patients with UM will develop metastases with the liver being the most commonly affected organ in up to 95% of the cases.
8 The mortality rate in the 15 years following diagnosis hovers at approximately 50% and has not improved in the past 50 years.
9,10 Moreover, there is no currently available therapeutic modality that has been shown to prolong the lives of UM patients with liver metastases.
11 One of the most exciting areas of cancer research is the emergence of immune-based therapies that have produced promising results.
12–17 Developing new treatments for UM patients, such as immunotherapy, would benefit enormously from prospective studies in animal models. Historically, three categories of animal models have been used in ocular melanoma research: transplantation of human UM cells into the eyes of immune-deficient mice such as T-cell–deficient nude mice
18,19; in situ transformation of ocular cells through the insertion of an oncogenic transgene into inbred mouse strains
20,21; or transplantation of cutaneous murine melanoma cells, such as B16 melanoma, into the eyes of syngeneic C57BL/6 mice. Transplantation of human UM cells into the eyes of immune-deficient mice produces intraocular melanomas that metastasize to the liver and, thus, recapitulates the metastatic behavior of UM.
22–27 However, because this is a tumor xenograft residing within an immune-deficient host, this model has limited applications and it is not amenable for studying the role of the adaptive T-cell–mediated antitumor response. Murine models of in situ transformation of ocular cells through insertion of an oncogenic transgene into the genome of inbred mice have been fraught with confounding properties that limit their usefulness. Our laboratory produced a transgenic mouse model using the simian virus 40 (SV40) transgene under the influence of a tyrosinase promoter.
20 Pigmented intraocular tumors arose at the choroid-RPE interface. However, the tumors displayed ultrastructural and morphological characteristics consistent with RPE carcinomas. Moreover, pigmented cutaneous tumors arose in a high percentage of the transgenic mice, further complicating its utility as a model of UM. More recently, Schiffner et al.
21 reported a transgenic mouse model in which the glutamate receptor 1 (Grm1) transgene, under the control of the dopachrome tautomerase promoter, was introduced into C57BL/6 mice. Transgenic mice developed melanocytic tumors localized in the ciliary body and choroid, but also in the skin. In an earlier study in this transgenic model, skin melanoma cells were detected in lymph nodes, spleen, lung, and liver.
28 Because the skin and ocular tumors both express the Grm1 transgene, it is not possible to distinguish skin metastases from UM metastases in this model. A third category of animal models of UM involves the intraocular transplantation of cutaneous B16 murine melanoma into the eyes of syngeneic C57BL/6 mice. The most obvious shortcoming of this approach is that skin melanomas differ markedly from UM in their molecular and clinical properties. However, the B16 melanoma arose in a C57BL/6 mouse and thus confronts the host only with tumor-associated and tumor-specific antigens and as a result allows analysis of the adaptive and innate immune responses. Moreover, B16LS9 melanomas display a propensity to metastasize to the liver, which recapitulates the metastatic behavior of human UM. Prospective studies using this model have revealed a strong association between NK cell activity and resistance to the development of liver metastases that is remarkably similar to findings from retrospective studies in human UM patients.
19,23,25,29–35