Using high-resolution OCT imaging, we examined the optical structure of the mouse retina under LA and DA conditions.
Figure 1A shows an example of an averaged B-scan OCT image (40 B-scans of 1000 A-scans, same location) taken through the optic nerve head from the same mouse eye in the LA condition (upper) and after overnight DA (lower). For better comparison of the two conditions, a smaller region marked by blue lines shows images at the same eccentricity compared side-by-side (
Fig. 1B). For the inner retina, from the nerve fiber layer (NFL) to the outer limiting membrane (OLM), it is clear that the OCT images obtained under LA and DA conditions are very similar. This similarity also can be observed in the intensity-depth profile shown in
Figure 1C which plots averaged values of 10 pixels in the center regions of each OCT image shown in
Figure 1B. For the OCT intensity-depth profiles derived from the LA (red trace) and DA (blue trace) images, the troughs and peaks of the inner retina (from NFL to OLM) are largely superimposed.
However, for the outer retina, the OCT images showed significant differences in the LA/DA conditions.
Figure 1D illustrates enlarged images of the distal retina for a region outlined by the green dashed line in
Figure 1B. Four distinct bands could be identified conclusively on OCT images obtained in either condition, that is OLM, IS/ep, PRT, and RPE. In the LA retina, an additional hyporeflective OCT band separated the PRT and RPE bands (
Figs. 1B,
1D, red arrows). However, this hyporeflective band was undetectable in the DA retina, where the PRT and RPE bands abutted each other. Consequently, the insertion of an additional hyporeflective band between the PRT and RPE bands in the LA image appeared to account for the increase in the optical thickness of the “outer retina” (from the OLM to the RPE) in the OCT images when compared to their DA counterparts. On the intensity-depth profiles of the outer retinal region shown in
Figure 1E, an additional trough of hyporeflectivity is observed in the curve of the light-adapted image (red arrow). This hyporeflective band appears to displace the RPE and choroid peaks to a more distal location in the LA OCT image (red trace) compared to the DA condition (blue trace).
Figure 2 summarizes quantitative measurements of retinal layer thickness in the OCT images obtained under LA and DA conditions. Two methods were used for measuring the retinal layer thickness. First, the retinal layers were measured manually using the conventions shown in
Figure 2A. For each eye, layer thicknesses were measured at a retinal location approximately 0.4 mm away from the optic nerve head for left and right image fields. Values from horizontal and vertical B-scans were averaged. Optical coherence tomography measurements of the thickness of the whole retina and the inner and outer regions under LA and DA conditions are shown in
Figure 2B. There is a significant difference in total retinal thickness (measured from NFL to RPE) between the LA and DA OCT images. On average, the overall thickness of the LA retina increased by 6.1 ± 0.8 μm (
n = 13 eyes,
P < 0.001) over the DA retina. The retinal thickness increase was detected mainly in the outer retina (OLM to RPE; 6.8 ± 0.7 μm,
P < 0.001), with no significant LA/DA thickness changes in the inner retina (NFL to OLM). Adopting the names previously used to define 3 outer retinal sublayers in human OCT images,
7,8 we measured these layers in the mouse for LA/DA thickness changes as illustrated in
Figure 2A: the IS, from the OLM to the distal edge of IS/ep band; the outer segment equivalent length (OSEL; described by Abramoff et al.
13), from the distal edge of the IS/ep to the apical edge of RPE band; and the RPE, thickness of the RPE band. As shown in
Figure 2C, no adaptation differences are detected in the thickness of the IS and RPE layers. On the other hand, the OSEL exhibited significant thickening in the LA versus DA condition, with an average difference of 5.7 ± 0.6 μm (
n = 13,
P < 0.001).
The second approach for measuring retinal layer thickness used the Diver auto-segmentation software (Bioptogen), which produces 8 segmented lines with 7 retinal layers (illustrated in
Fig. 2D). When the volume scan (C-scan, 1.4 × 1.4 mm, 1000 A-scan/B-Scan × 100 B-scan) OCT images from a subgroup of mice are analyzed by Diver, consistent elongation of the OSEL layer is observed, whereas no significant change in thickness is detected for the other 6 retinal layers (data not shown).
Figure 2E shows the averaged LA/DA thickness changes of the OSEL layer from the OCT C-scan at various ETDRS grid (100/300/600 μm) retinal regions (insert in
Fig. 2E). Except for grid 1, which is occupied by the optic nerve head, similar magnitudes of thickness changes are detected for the other 8 retinal regions of the mouse fundus, implying that LA elicits a uniform lengthening of the OSEL thickness across the whole retina. The averaged LA/DA OSEL thickness difference of the 8 grid regions was 5.3 ± 0.6 μm (
n = 8), a value similar in magnitude to our manual measurements (
Fig. 2C).