Using the validated and consistent measurement of SD-OCT, our analysis describes the structural changes occurring in retina in the months around the onset of symptoms in LHON patients, and suggests thinning of the RNFL, GCL, and IPL, may drive part of the vision loss experienced by patients with LHON. We would recommend using GCL as an anatomic marker of therapeutic effect over RNFL, as our results show a stronger relationship between these layers and visual acuity. While our results are not inconsistent with changes in the RNFL causing vision loss, we were able to identify a significant difference in the thickness of the GCL and IPL before changes were conclusively seen in the substructures of the RNFL. Therefore, when considering evolving treatments for LHON, early treatment before RNFL shows thinning would be advised.
Our results establish that the retinal structural changes evolve during the time around onset of LHON symptoms, and suggest two distinct response patterns: progressive thinning that begins around the onset of symptoms, and slows at approximately 6 months, in which thinning is associated with vision loss; and swelling around the time of the onset of symptoms, with increasing thickness associated with vision loss; the RNFL, GCL, and IPL behave like the former, and the INL, OPL, and ONL behave like the later.
Compared with previous research, our data are consistent with reports of a relationship between visual acuity and RNFL thinning,
2 and in contrast to studies that found RNFL thickening around the time of onset.
Our analysis does have some limitations. Leber's Hereditary Optic Neuropathy studies are inherently difficult due to the inability to identify which carriers will go on to have vision loss. Although the longitudinal nature of our study provided multiple observations on each subject, our study enrolled nine participants. Due to the modest sample size, the complexity of our statistical models was limited by power considerations. Although we were able to control for age and within-eye correlation, we would have additionally liked to control for other possible confounders, and we would have liked to test to see if the pattern of swelling and thinning differed by mutation status. Similarly, due to the sample size, it is possible that the assumptions of GEE are not fully met, and therefore, although GEE is still the best way to control for interperson correlation, the GEE estimates may be unstable. In addition, many patients present for evaluation only after their initial visual decline, so the presymptomatic eyes in our cohort are largely from individuals who have already experienced unilateral vision loss, which may not represent the true thickness seen in asymptomatic carriers. Additionally, our analyses tested multiple hypotheses, and therefore the reported statistical significance threshold (α = 0.05) does not definitively establish a causal relationship. However, as the nature of our analysis is descriptive of the structural changes, we did not design our study to meet a strict significance threshold such as a Bonferroni correction.
These analyses suggest several paths for future research. Future studies to examine retinal structure changes in individuals who regain vision might provide insight in to the potential protective structural differences that are associated with this regain of function, which may further suggest therapeutic targets. It would also be of interest to see if a threshold of GCL, RNFL, or IPL loss exists in asymptomatic carriers before visual symptoms occur. Given the dramatic decline in thickness in the GCL, RNFL, and IPL, changes from an asymptomatic carriers baseline may indicate that vision loss is imminent, and present a potential therapeutic window.
In summary, our investigation uses SD-OCT to measure retinal segmentation and demonstrate a structure-function relationship between visual acuity and retinal anatomy in LHON patients. Our findings suggest that the variability in the RNFL observed by others does not translate to patterns of retinal ganglion cell death. We suggest that instead of RNFL, that thinning in the GCL and, to a lesser extent, IPL, may drive vision loss in LHON patients. In the GCL and IPL, there is strong evidence of thinning that begins at or immediately following the onset of symptoms, and the thinning is associated with vision loss. Our analyses also demonstrate the greater sensitivity of SD-OCT compared with TD-OCT, and supports the use of SD-OCT of the GCL as a secondary or coprimary endpoint in clinical trials, because there is a clear linear pattern of GCL thinning during the acute phase, followed by relative preservation of thickness after 6 months. If these structural changes are verified to be causing the vision loss, they provide a compelling possibility for therapeutic targets to slow the progression of vision loss associated with LHON.