In our study, glaucomatous eyes also had the smallest prelaminar thickness. In vivo assessment of ONH structures in glaucomatous patients demonstrated that eyes with deeper ONH cup and thinner RNFL presented with less prelaminar tissue
15,37 (Vessani R, et al.
IOVS 2013;54:ARVO E-Abstract 76). Surprisingly, in our NAION eyes with prominent optic atrophy and the same RNFL loss as in the POAG eyes, prelaminar tissue was thicker than in POAG eyes and healthy controls. Lee et al.
24 also found that prelaminar thickness was less in glaucomatous patients than in NAION patients. Similarly, Ing et al.
36 found prelaminar tissue thinning following experimental optic nerve transaction. Lack of optic disc excavation and changes in optic rim in atrophic optic nerve due to NAION have been described in previous studies.
1,38 However, Heyreh and Jonas,
39 in their series of 29 patients, revealed that arteritic AION resulted in profound rim loss and optic disc cupping. They proposed that in arteritic AION there is permanent thrombotic occlusion of the posterior ciliary arteries and total infarction of the involved part of the ONH, leading to massive loss of not only axons but also connective tissue and supporting cells of the ONH. In contrast, in patients with NAION, ischemia is mild, and fluorescein angiography has shown evidence of only transient hypoperfusion or nonperfusion of the ONH during sleep in most cases. It was noted that another difference is that NAION eyes have no excavation and have crowded optic nerve before the attack. While we detected a thinner prelaminar tissue of NAION eyes compared to their healthy fellow eyes, this tissue was significantly thicker than in healthy control eyes. No enrollment and assessment of unaffected fellow eyes of NAION patients were performed in the Lee et al.
24 study. In addition, in contrast to our study, Lee et al.
24 showed that prelaminar tissue thickness was thinner in NAION patients than in healthy controls. The source of this interstudy discrepancy might be different methods of measuring prelaminar tissue thickness. Lee et al.
24 measured prelaminar tissue area on the radial B-scan, and average prelaminar tissue thickness was calculated by dividing the prelaminar tissue area by half of the BMO distance. We measured the prelaminar tissue thickness in the horizontal central scan after averaging three measurements (
Fig. 2). In addition, Lee et al.
24 included only patients who had been diagnosed at least 6 months earlier, and prelaminar swelling might not have been fully resolved after 3 months of disease occurrence in our study.