September 2016
Volume 57, Issue 12
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2016
Effect of Tonicity and UV Riboflavin Cross-linking Treatment on Corneal Biomechanical Properties using Optical Coherence Elastography
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Srilatha Vantipalli
    College of Optometry , University of Houston, Houston, Texas, United States
  • Jiasong Li
    Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Houston , Houston , Texas, United States
  • Manmohan Singh
    Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Houston , Houston , Texas, United States
  • Kirill Larin
    Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Houston , Houston , Texas, United States
  • Michael D Twa
    School of Optometry , University of Alabama, Birmingham , Alabama, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Srilatha Vantipalli, None; Jiasong Li , None; Manmohan Singh, None; Kirill Larin, None; Michael Twa, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  NIH/NEI R01-EY022362 and NIH/NEI P30 EY07551.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science September 2016, Vol.57, No Pagination Specified. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Srilatha Vantipalli, Jiasong Li, Manmohan Singh, Kirill Larin, Michael D Twa; Effect of Tonicity and UV Riboflavin Cross-linking Treatment on Corneal Biomechanical Properties using Optical Coherence Elastography. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2016;57(12):No Pagination Specified.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : Current techniques to derive corneal biomechanical properties do not consider the influence of tissue hydration when measuring the effect of collagen cross-linking. Our previous studies with optical coherence elastography (OCE) show that corneal hydration and stiffness are positively correlated. Here we investigate the combined effect of hydration and UV riboflavin cross-linking (CXL) treatment in rabbit cornea.

Methods : Dynamic elastography imaging was performed using phase-sensitive optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging (30 kHz A-scan rate) to quantify the tissue deformation dynamics resulting from a short-duration, spatially discrete, low-force air-pulse (150µm spot size; 1ms duration; 4Pa (0.03mmHg)). The viscoelastic tissue recovery response (relaxation rate; RR) was used to characterize the time-dependent surface deformation at the corneal apex. After epithelial debridement, fresh ex vivo globes with fixed IOP (15mmHg) were instilled isotonic riboflavin solution (n=6; 0.1% riboflavin in 2.5% dextran dissolved in PBS) and hypertonic riboflavin solution (n=7; 0.1% riboflavin in 20% dextran dissolved in PBS) every 5 min for 30min, followed by UV irradiation (365nm, 3mW/cm2) for 30min while instilling riboflavin. Central corneal thickness (CCT) was determined from structural OCT imaging and relaxation rates were determined from the OCE recorded viscoelastic recovery responses before and after CXL treatment.

Results : Isotonic riboflavin did not affect CCT (P>.05) while hypertonic riboflavin caused a significant CCT decrease (30.6%; P=.01) from 618 ± 57.4µm to 428.7 ± 61.5µm. Isotonic CXL treatment showed significantly greater RR (10.3%; P=.01) after treatment (2.53 ± 0.1ms-1) than in untreated tissue (2.29 ± 0.1ms-1). However, hypertonic CXL treatment showed no change in RR (P>.05).

Conclusions : Faster recovery (higher RR) implies stiffer corneal material properties after isotonic CXL treatment. Hydration (tonicity) driven corneal thinning with hypertonic riboflavin caused a stiffness decrease that offset the expected stiffer material properties due to CXL treatment resulting in no change in corneal material properties after hypertonic CXL treatment. This demonstrates corneal hydration is an important factor in the measurement of corneal biomechanics that can confound short-term effects due to CXL treatment.

This is an abstract that was submitted for the 2016 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Seattle, Wash., May 1-5, 2016.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×