September 2016
Volume 57, Issue 12
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2016
A genetic risk prediction model for progression of age-related macular degeneration
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Wenqiu Wang
    Shiley Eye Center, San Diego, California, United States
  • Katarzyna Gawlik
    R&D Chemistry, AutoGenomics Inc., Vista, California, United States
  • Cindy Wen
    Shiley Eye Center, San Diego, California, United States
  • Jie Zhu
    UCSD, San Diego, California, United States
  • Henry Ferreyra
    Shiley Eye Center, San Diego, California, United States
  • Sherman Chang
    R&D Chemistry, AutoGenomics Inc., Vista, California, United States
  • Kang Zhang
    UCSD, San Diego, California, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Wenqiu Wang, None; Katarzyna Gawlik, AutoGenomics (E); Cindy Wen, None; Jie Zhu, None; Henry Ferreyra, None; Sherman Chang, AutoGenomics (E); Kang Zhang, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  none
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science September 2016, Vol.57, 2642. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Wenqiu Wang, Katarzyna Gawlik, Cindy Wen, Jie Zhu, Henry Ferreyra, Sherman Chang, Kang Zhang; A genetic risk prediction model for progression of age-related macular degeneration. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2016;57(12):2642.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is characterized by complex interactions between genetic and environmental factors. The aim of this study is to develop a prediction algorithm for AMD risk assessment based on individual genetic profile and environmental factors.

Methods : DNA samples were genotyped using the AutoGenomics INFINITI platform. AMD panel included ABCA1(rs1883025); APOE(rs429358, rs7412); ARMS2/HTRA1(rs10490924, EU427539, rs11200638); C3(rs2230199); CCDC109B(rs17440077); CETP(rs3764261); CFB(rs4151669, rs522162); CFH(rs1048663, rs1061170, rs10737680, rs1329428, rs2274700, rs3766405, rs412852, rs800292); CFI(rs10033900); COL8A1(rs13095226); LIPC(rs493258, rs10468017); LPL(rs12678919); TIMP3(rs9621532) and VEGFA(rs3025000, rs943080). Class prediction model building and testing were performed using TreeNet software.

Results : We genotyped 30 SNPs from 1254 AMD patients (382 Intermediate AMD, 269 GA and 603 CNV) and 423 normal control patients. For AMD risk assessment, we tested if TreeNet can be applied to genotyping data. The known published odds ratios for 30 SNPs from the panel were used as numeric variables in the model building for 872 AMD patients and 423 controls. Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) for both models were highly comparable (ROC=0.88 for numeric and ROC=0.94 for categorical) suggesting that TreeNet can be used for descriptive genotyping data. Next, we analyzed the performance of the prediction model for AMD progression risk assessment. The ROC for Normal Control vs Intermediate AMD Stage was 74% sensitivity and 82% specificity. The ROC for Intermediate AMD vs GA was 82% sensitivity and 77% specificity. The ROC for Intermediate AMD vs CNV was 91% sensitivity and 58% specificity. The variable ranking showed the most important SNPs associated with AMD at the top of the list including rs412852 (CFH), rs2230199 (C3) and rs10490924 (ARMS2/HTRA1) which is in accordance with previously published data.

Conclusions : These results suggest that the prediction algorithm can be used for the AMD risk assessment. It can also incorporate environmental factors such as age, smoking and other variables into the model building. Having a larger group of patients with well characterized AMD phenotypes, the algorithm could also be applied to predict disease progression and therapeutic response, and aid personalized precision medicine.

This is an abstract that was submitted for the 2016 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Seattle, Wash., May 1-5, 2016.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×