September 2016
Volume 57, Issue 12
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2016
Visual outcomes and intraocular pressure changes following silicone oil removal
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • James Lin
    Ophthalmology, Columbia University, Cedar Grove, New Jersey, United States
  • Aakriti Garg
    Ophthalmology, Columbia University, Cedar Grove, New Jersey, United States
  • Jonathan S Chang
    Ophthalmology, Columbia University, Cedar Grove, New Jersey, United States
  • Jason Horowitz
    Ophthalmology, Columbia University, Cedar Grove, New Jersey, United States
  • William M Schiff
    Manhattan Eye, Ear, and Throat Hospital, New York, New York, United States
  • Rachel Mogil
    Manhattan Eye, Ear, and Throat Hospital, New York, New York, United States
  • Stanley Chang
    Ophthalmology, Columbia University, Cedar Grove, New Jersey, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   James Lin, None; Aakriti Garg, None; Jonathan Chang, None; Jason Horowitz, None; William Schiff, None; Rachel Mogil, None; Stanley Chang, Alcon (R)
  • Footnotes
    Support  National Institute of Health Core grant 5P30EY019007, The Gerstner Family Foundation, Unrestricted funds from Research to Prevent Blindness and Columbia University
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science September 2016, Vol.57, 4478. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      James Lin, Aakriti Garg, Jonathan S Chang, Jason Horowitz, William M Schiff, Rachel Mogil, Stanley Chang; Visual outcomes and intraocular pressure changes following silicone oil removal. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2016;57(12):4478.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : Elevated intraocular pressure (IOP) is a complication of silicone oil tamponade for retinal detachment repair, and commonly an indication for silicone oil removal (SOR). We performed a retrospective clinical study to examine the IOP lowering effects of and visual outcomes following SOR.

Methods : Longitudinal data from a university-based retina practice was reviewed from 2010-2015, including patients who underwent silicone oil tamponade for retinal detachment repair with subsequent SOR. Patients receiving a combined SOR and glaucoma procedure were excluded. Patients were separated into two groups based on whether they were on glaucoma medications pre-SOR; paired t-tests were used to determine a change in medications post-operatively within the two groups. Maximum IOP up to 2 months prior to SOR was compared to IOP at <1 month and 3-6 months post-SOR using the paired t-test. Snellen visual acuity (VA) prior to SOR was compared to VA up to 6 months post-SOR using the paired t-test.

Results : Overall, the mean IOP was lower up to 1 month after SOR compared to pre-op IOP (14.18 vs. 20.18, p=0.0025). The lasting effect of lowered IOP was seen at 3-6 months post-SOR (21.4 pre-SOR vs. 14.3 post-SOR, p=0.01). 12 (36%) of the 33 total patients underwent SOR secondary to elevated IOP (>21 mmHg). In these patients, the mean IOP was lower at both <1 month (31.3 pre-SOR vs. 18.3 post-SOR, p= 0.007) and 3-6 months (31.7 pre-SOR vs. 15.4 post-SOR, p=0.009). The 19 patients who were not using glaucoma medications pre-SOR did not have a change in medications after SOR (0 pre-SOR vs. 0.21 post-SOR, p=0.1). Comparing the 14 patients who were on glaucoma medications pre-SOR, the number of medications post-SOR was not significantly lower (2.7 pre-SOR vs. 1.7 post-SOR, p=0.057). Best corrected VA was not found to be different at 1 month (p=0.57) or 3-6 months (p=0.83) follow up. After 1 month, 28% of all patients achieved VA >20/200. 3-6 months post-SOR, 38% of patients achieved VA >20/200, while 4% of patients achieved >20/40.

Conclusions : While VA was not significantly improved in long term follow up after SOR, the effect of SOR in lowering IOP among all patients is demonstrated regardless of whether SOR was performed secondary to elevated IOP. This suggests that silicone oil may be sub-clinically present in the anterior chamber in all patients with silicone oil tamponade, with its total removal contributing to decreased IOP.

This is an abstract that was submitted for the 2016 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Seattle, Wash., May 1-5, 2016.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×