September 2016
Volume 57, Issue 12
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2016
Patient Satisfaction in Emergency Eye Care: Yelp Reviews as a first look
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Benjamin Jastrzembski
    Department of Ophthalmology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
    Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medial School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Benjamin Jastrzembski, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science September 2016, Vol.57, 5549. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Benjamin Jastrzembski; Patient Satisfaction in Emergency Eye Care: Yelp Reviews as a first look
      . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2016;57(12):5549.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Purpose : Patient satisfaction is a growing priority in the context of pay for performance reimbursement, but the determinants of patient satisfaction in the setting of emergency eye care are poorly characterized. In this retrospective study, public, online Yelp reviews ( of 4 dedicated eye emergency departments in the U.S. were examined to identify factors affecting patient satisfaction.

Methods : All online Yelp reviews discussing eye emergency departments at 4 U.S. hospitals were included in the study. Each review rated overall experience on a scale from 1 (low) to 5 (high) stars and included an unstructured, free-form comment. Free-form comments were categorized as discussing one or more of the following themes: visit time, cost & insurance, medical knowledge & competence, physician & staff interpersonal skills, and care provided by residents / trainees.

Results : Thirty-three online Yelp reviews from 4 eye emergency departments were included in the analysis. The average numerical rating was 2.9 stars with a standard deviation of 1.7 stars. The most common theme discussed in free-form comments was visit time (79% of reviews). Twelve of the 13 one-star reviews discussed visit time in the free-form comment. The least common theme discussed was cost & insurance (12% of reviews) and care by residents / trainees (18% of reviews). Only 1 of the 13 one-star reviews discussed care being provided by a resident / trainee. There was no statistically significant difference in star rating between reviews that discussed care being provided by residents / trainees and those that did not (p=0.678).

Conclusions : Online reviews of 4 dedicated eye emergency departments suggest mixed patient satisfaction overall. The high number of reviews discussing visit times indicates this is a key determinant of patient satisfaction. There was no evidence to suggest that care by residents / trainees, who typically provide the majority of care in emergency eye settings, had a positive or negative effect on patient satisfaction. The Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) is currently developing the Emergency Department Patient Experiences with Care (EDPEC) survey, which will further elucidate factors affecting patient satisfaction in EDs. The EDPEC survey will also facilitate comparison between multiple EDs and pay for performance reimbursement.

This is an abstract that was submitted for the 2016 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Seattle, Wash., May 1-5, 2016.


This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.