The exact mechanism of IOP elevation induced by suture compression is uncertain. First of all, in the rat model, comparison between hydrostatic (by anterior chamber cannulation) and rebound tonometer IOP measurements had confirmed that, following suture placement, IOP readings by the rebound Tonolab reflected the true IOP.
8 This comparison was not conducted in our study. However, we were able to measure changes of central corneal thickness and corneal curvature prior to and following suture placement using OCT (
n = 4). As shown in the
Supplementary Figure S1, the baseline group was with suture but with the knot loosely tied (
Supplementary Fig. S1A). In the same eye, anterior chamber OCT was measured again immediately after the knot was tightened (
Supplementary Fig. S1B).
Supplementary Fig. S1C was at 2 weeks after suture placement. The data showed that there was no difference in central corneal thickness across the three time points (see
Supplementary Table S1,
P > 0.05, 1-way RM ANOVA). The same result was found for the corneal curvature. Given these two unchanged parameters, it is reasonable to assume that the rebound Tonolab would reflect the true changes in IOP. Given suture removal led to IOP reduction within 24 hours, it implies that ocular hypertension is not associated with chronic pathologic responses, such as inflammation of the anterior chamber outflow pathways.
36–38 In addition, the data in the rat suture model indicated that the anterior chamber angle is not affected by the suture compression.
8 Furthermore, it is unlikely that we would have affected aqueous formation as it is associated with active transport mechanisms from the blood supply to the anterior eye structures.
39 Given that enhancement of this blood flow following suture compression is unlikely, increased aqueous formation leading to elevated IOP is also unlikely. In contrast, if the suture compression impairs this blood flow, we should observe a reduced aqueous production and would expect a lower IOP. Aqueous outflow from the anterior chamber involves two pathways, the conventional trabecular meshwork pathway and uveoscleral outflow pathway.
40 Aqueous outflow through the trabecular meshwork is unlikely to be impaired in that the anterior chamber angle was previously reported to be normal.
8 Impairment of uveoscleral outflow has also been significantly associated with IOP elevation in a rat model of congenital glaucoma.
41 Given the position of the suture, compression of the iris root and ciliary muscle as well as the choroidal and scleral space is likely. We propose that such compression would alter the normal physiology of these tissues. Compression likely compromises uveoscleral outflow facility. More specifically, reduced spacing in the ciliary muscle due to compression would lead to reduced outflow dynamics.
42 In addition, compression of the ciliary muscle may also lead to reduced aqueous outflow as a result of compromised aqueous pumping capacity by the scleral spur.
43 Another element to determine IOP is the episcleral venous pressure. Intrascleral veins and the episcleral plexus may also have been compressed leading to elevated episcleral venous pressure.
44 Taken together, possible contributing factors include reduced aqueous outflow facility (mainly the uveoscleral pathway and trabecular meshwork pumping) and increased episcleral venous pressure. Further investigations are required to confirm these hypotheses, as techniques for the evaluation of aqueous humor dynamics in the mouse eye have been documented in recent studies.
45,46 It is also worth noting that the mechanism in this model may be similar to that leading to transient IOP elevation in patients following scleral buckling surgery. It is thought that the buckle obstructs venous outflow resulting in engorgement of the ciliary body. This change can cause the ciliary body to rotate anteriorly affecting the angle and thus causing IOP elevation. Given the different anatomy between human and mouse eyes, this etiology may be more pronounced in mice.