Table 1 shows the demographic data from the normal subjects and patients with POAG and OH, and the results of Tukey's multiple comparisons among the three cohorts. A value of
P < 0.05 was considered significant. There were no significant differences among the three cohorts except for higher myopia in the POAG and OH eyes (
P = 0.005 and
P = 0.041, respectively) and low SS in the POAG (
P = 0.05). Eleven of 14 eyes with OH and 42 of 66 eyes with POAG were treated with topical eye drops.
Concerning data reproducibility, the coefficients of variation of the intravisit examinations for the SS, VD, and PLFI were 4.3 ± 1.6%, 3.4 ± 3.1%, and 6.3 ± 2.7%, respectively.
In
Table 2, the differences in the MD, GLV, VD, VD/SS, and cpNFLT between the normal and POAG cohorts were significant (
P < 0.001). The difference in the PLFI/UA also was significant between normal and POAG eyes; however, the
P value for this comparison was low (
P = 0.020,
Table 2).
When these parameters in OH were compared to those in normal eyes, two OCTA parameters, the VD (
P = 0.018) and VD/SS (
P = 0.018), were significantly less in OH eyes, whereas no significant differences were found for the MD, GLV, PLFI/UA, and cpNFLT (
Table 2). This reduced VD and VD/SS in OH eyes led to nonsignificant difference in these two parameters between OH and POAG eyes (
P = 0.243, and 0.061, respectively) despite presence of significant differences in MD, GLV, and cpNFLT (
P < 0.001). Among the OCTA parameters PLFI/UA was more resistant to damage by intraocular hypertension and glaucomatous insult. Even though the difference in PLFI/UA between OH and normal eyes did not reach significance (
P = 0.582), the VD and VD/SS were significantly lower in the OH and POAG eyes than those in normal eyes (
Table 2).
Table 3 shows the Pearson's correlation coefficients and the
P values from univariate linear regression among 10 parameters evaluated in the 25 normal eyes. In the normal eyes, the SS was associated significantly with the VD (
P = 0.001), PLFI/UA (
P < 0.001), and age (
P = 0.015). Other positive associations were found between the GLV and cpNFLT (
P < 0.001), VD and PLFI/UA (
P = 0.003), and PLFI and disc area (
P = 0.0254,
Table 3).
Table 4 shows the Pearson's correlation coefficients and
P values for univariate linear regression among 11 parameters in 80 eyes with POAG (
n = 66) and OH (
n = 14). Vascular parameters, such as the VD and PLFI/UA, had significant univariate linear correlations with many parameters. Among them, the VD and PLFI/UA were correlated significantly with function parameters, such as the MD (
P = 0.002 and
P = 0.001, respectively) and structural parameters, such as the GLV (
P = 0.002 and
P = 0.019, respectively) and cpNFLT (
P < 0.001 and
P = 0.003). These findings suggested that the VD and PLFI/UA decreased in glaucomatous eyes and agreed with results of multiple comparisons (
Table 2).
On the other hand, the SS decreased with advances in glaucomatous nerve loss and was associated with the SQRE, MD, cpNFLT, VD, PLFI, and PLFI/UA (
P = 0.010,
P = 0.039,
P = 0.018,
P < 0.001,
P = 0.027, and
P < 0.001, respectively). While, the refractive error was associated with the SS, VD, and age (
P = 0.010,
P = 0.046 and
P < 0.001, respectively;
Table 4).
When the cpNFLT was set as a dependent parameter and stepwise regression analysis with backward elimination was performed for eight independent parameters (SS, SQRE, logMAR, MD, GLV, VD, PLFI/UA, age), the GLV was associated most strongly (P < 0.001) with the cpNFLT. The acquired regression equation was cpNFLT = −0.093age + 0.435 SQRE – 1.10GLV + 14.78PLFI/UA + 94.37 (multiple coefficient of determination; R2 = 0.776). The P values (and t values) for age, GLV, PLFI/UA, and SQRE and constant were P = 0.199 (−1.29), P < 0.001 (−13.95), P = 0.079 (1.78), P = 0.067 (1.86), and P < 0.001 (11.94), respectively.
When the powers of the SS, GLV, VD, PLFI/UA, and cpNFLT to discriminate POAG from normal eyes were studied by the ROC curves, there were significant differences among the five parameters. The AUC was largest for the GLV followed by the cpNFLT, VD, PLFI/UA, and SS. The AUCs and
P values using the Sen and Delong test
11 were 0.974 (
P < 0.001), 0.936 (
P < 0.001), 0.832 (
P < 0.001), 0.662 (
P = 0.012), and 0.619 (
P = 0.085), respectively (
Fig. 3). The discriminatory power of the GLV was significantly stronger than that of the VD (
P = 0.006), PLFI/UA (
P < 0.0001), and SS (
P < 0.0001), and marginally stronger than that of the cpNFLT (
P = 0.068). The discriminatory power of the VD was stronger than that of the PLFI/UA (
P = 0.002) and SS (
P < 0.0001); however, it was less than that of the GLV (
P = 0.006) and marginally less than cpNFLT (
P = 0.055;
Table 5).
When the powers of the five parameters to discriminate OH from normal eyes were studied, the AUC was the largest for the VD followed by the SS, PLFI/UA, cpNFLT, and GLV. The AUCs and
P values were 0.724 (
P = 0.006), 0.599 (
P = 0.388), 0.569 (
P = 0.482), 0.553 (
P = 0.613), and 0.529 (
P = 0.784), respectively (
Fig. 4).
The VD was the only significant (
P = 0.006) parameter that could discriminate OH from normal eyes (
Fig. 4). The finding agreed with the multiple comparisons (
Table 2), and its discriminatory power was significantly (
P = 0.038) higher than that of the PLFI/UA (
Table 6).