In this study, 19 eyes of 19 patients with CSC and 20 eyes of 10 healthy subjects were included. Fifteen patients had unilateral CSC and four patients had bilateral CSC. Central serous chorioretinopathy patients and control subjects were similar in age (53.11 ± 8.8 vs. 57.5 ± 8.4;
P = 0.8) and axial length (23.2 ± 1.3 mm vs. 23.9 ± 1.3 mm;
P = 0.43). There was no difference in sex distribution between the CSC patients and control subjects (18 men and 1 female versus 9 men and 1 female;
P = 0.6). The mean subfoveal choroidal thickness of eyes with CSC (337.0 ± 57.93 μm) was significantly larger (
P < 0.0001) compared with control eyes (211.2 ± 60.1 μm) (
Table 1). Overall the choroidal vascular flow area was significantly higher in eyes with CSC than in control eyes (53.4 ± 5.8% vs. 49.45 ± 8.16%;
P = 0.0001;
Table 2). The choroidal vascular flow area at the level of the CC was significantly higher in eyes with CSC than in control eyes (50.97 ± 2.8% vs. 48.43 ± 1%;
P < 0.0001). The choroidal vascular flow area at deeper choroidal levels (L1, L2, L3) (54.22 ± 6.3% vs. 49.80 ± 9.3%;
P = 0.0083) was significantly higher in eyes with CSC than in control eyes (
Table 2). Within the choroid of CSC patients choroidal vascular flow area of the CC was significantly lower than the deeper level (50.97 ± 2.8% vs. 54.22 ± 6.3%;
P = 0.025) while there were no differences within the choroid of control eyes (
Table 3). Unaffected fellow eyes (
n = 15) and control eyes were similar in age (
P = 0.16) and axial length (
P = 0.32). The mean subfoveal choroidal thickness was larger in the unaffected fellow eyes (298.6 ± 101.9 μm) compared with the control eyes
P = 0.0001. Overall, the choroidal vascular flow area was significantly higher in the unaffected fellow eyes with CSC than in control eyes (52.78 ± 6.3%;
P = 0.03). The choroidal vascular flow area at the level of the CC was significantly higher in the unaffected fellow eye (50.74 ± 0.9%;
P = 0.02) than in control eyes (
Table 4). Mean subfoveal choroidal thickness of unaffected eyes (298.6 ± 57.87 μm;
P = 0.06) was not statistically significant different compared with CSC eyes. Overall, the choroidal vascular flow area of unaffected fellow eyes did not differ significantly from CSC eyes (
P = 0.7), however the choroidal vascular flow area at the level of the CC was significantly higher in the CSC eyes (
P = 0.0009) compared with unaffected fellow eyes (
Table 5). There was no statistically significant correlation between the subfoveal choroidal thickness and the choroidal vascular flow area at the level of the microvasculature of the choroid at any level.