Conversely, when we divided the eyes into four subgroups based on photoreceptor integrity, that is, preserved ELM, EZ, and CIZ (13 eyes), preserved ELM and EZ but disrupted CIZ (39 eyes), preserved ELM but disrupted EZ and CIZ (21 eyes), and disrupted ELM, EZ, and CIZ (12 eyes), the mean vascular perfusion area differed significantly between the groups in both the SCP and DCP (
Supplementary Table S1). The mean vascular perfusion area was 4.06 ± 0.47, 3.89 ± 0.43, 3.57 ± 0.43, and 3.29 ± 0.40, respectively, in the SCP (
P < 0.001) and 4.23 ± 0.51, 3.94 ± 0.46, 3.54 ± 0.50, and 3.33 ± 0.48 in the DCP (
P < 0.001). In addition, the mean area of the FAZ differed significantly in the SCP (0.42 ± 0.16, 0.51 ± 0.29, 0.61 ± 0.41, and 0.83 ± 0.52, respectively,
P = 0.034) between the groups. The mean area of the FAZ in the DCP differed between the groups (0.63 ± 0.21, 0.73 ± 0.37, 0.80 ± 0.39, and 0.95 ± 0.48, respectively,
P = 0.189); however, the difference was not statistically significant.