Having demonstrated that the aqueous protein level was correlated with the severity of iris damage, we sought to evaluate the association of iris damage and aqueous levels of protein and cytokines in detail. We assessed the aqueous protein and cytokine levels after classifying the iris damage into four grades as reported previously.
12 In brief, IDS 0 indicates no iris damage (
Fig. 1A); IDS 1 is defined as iris damage limited only to one quadrant (
Fig. 1B); or no iris damage with laser iridotomy (
Fig. 1D); IDS 2 is defined as iris damage in two quadrants (
Fig. 1C); IDS 3 is defined as iris damage in three quadrants (
Fig. 1E); and IDS 4 is defined as iris damage in four quadrants (
Fig. 1F). The aqueous protein levels in the eyes with IDS 0 increased from 0.52 ± 0.05 mg/mL (
Fig. 3) to 0.86 ± 0.18 mg/mL in IDS1 (
P > 0.99), 1.22 ± 0.24 mg/mL in IDS2 (
P = 0.024), 1.62 ± 0.30 mg/mL in IDS3 (
P < 0.001), and 1.80 ± 0.52 mg/mL in IDS4 (
P < 0.001). The protein concentration in the AqH significantly correlated with iris damage score (
r = 0.469,
P < 0.001). On the contrary, the aqueous cytokine levels were more complex (
Table 6;
Fig. 4). Although the levels of some aqueous cytokines were significantly elevated in eyes with IDS 1 to 4 compared with those in eyes with IDS 0, there were no statistically significant differences in aqueous cytokine levels among eyes with IDS 1, 2, 3, and 4 (
Fig. 4). However, IDS was significantly positively correlated with the levels of IL-1α, IL-1β, IL-4, IL-6, IL -8, IL -10, IL-12p70, IL-13, IL-17A, IFN-α, IFN-γ, MCP-1, TNF-α, E-selectin, P-selectin, sICAM-1, and IP-10 (
Table 6; Spearman's correlation,
P < 0.028).