June 2017
Volume 58, Issue 8
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2017

Comparison of visual acuity improvement by vitrecotmy for vitreous opacity between infections and non-infectious uveitis
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Yuka Hasegawa
    ophtalmology, National Defense Medical College, Tokorozawa, Japan
  • Tomohito Sato
    ophtalmology, National Defense Medical College, Tokorozawa, Japan
  • Rina Kinoshita
    ophtalmology, National Defense Medical College, Tokorozawa, Japan
  • Yutaka Sakurai
    ophtalmology, National Defense Medical College, Tokorozawa, Japan
  • Kozo Harimoto
    ophtalmology, National Defense Medical College, Tokorozawa, Japan
  • Masaru Takeuchi
    ophtalmology, National Defense Medical College, Tokorozawa, Japan
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Yuka Hasegawa, None; Tomohito Sato, None; Rina Kinoshita, None; Yutaka Sakurai, None; Kozo Harimoto, None; Masaru Takeuchi, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2017, Vol.58, 514. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Yuka Hasegawa, Tomohito Sato, Rina Kinoshita, Yutaka Sakurai, Kozo Harimoto, Masaru Takeuchi;
      Comparison of visual acuity improvement by vitrecotmy for vitreous opacity between infections and non-infectious uveitis. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2017;58(8):514.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose :

To evaluate outcome of diagnostic or therapeutic vitrectomy for vitreous opacity (VO) by comparing of the best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) before and after surgery between infectious and non-infectious uveitis patients.

Methods :
Retrospective, single-practice data analysis from a medical record system. Forty-one eyes of 31 patients, in which diagnostic or therapeutic vitrectomy was performed for VO between April 2012 and March 2015 in National Defense Medical College, were reviewed. Twelve eyes of 10 patients were infectious uveitis (males/females; 5/5, average age ± standard deviation; 71.8 ± 10.8 years old, primary top 3 diseases; endophthalmitis 5 eyes, cytomegalovirus retinitis 3 eyes, acute retinal necrosis 1 eye, ocular toxoplasmosis 1 eye), and 29 eyes of 21 patients were noninfectious uveitis (males/females; 3/18, average age; 64.0 ± 12.2 years old, primary top 3 diseases; sarcoidosis 9 eyes, primary central nervous system lymphoma 4 eyes, Behcet's disease 2 eyes). BCVA before surgery and at 1, 3, and 6 months after surgery were converted to logMAR, and improvement rate of logMAR were evaluated by the ratio of postoperative logMAR to preoperative logMAR at the individual time points.

Results : LogMAR before surgery, and at 1, 3, and 6 months after surgery were 1.76 ± 1.17, 0.99 ± 1.00, 1.04 ± 1.19, and 1.14 ± 1.04 in eyes with infectious uveitis, and were 0.52 ± 0.48, 0.17 ± 0.24, 0.18 ± 0.32 and 0.13 ±0.25 in eyes with noninfectious uveitis, respectively. LogMAR in eyes with infectious uveitis was significantly higher than those of noninfectious uveitis at each investigated point. However, improvement rates at 1, 3, and 6 months were 0.77 ± 1.10, 0.72 ± 1.19, and 0.62 ± 1.08 in eyes with infectious uveitis, and were 0.35 ± 0.44, 0.34 ± 0.42 and 0.38 ± 0.44 in eyes with noninfectious uveitis. There was no significant difference in postoperative improvement rates of logMAR at any investigated points between eyes with infectious uveitis and those with noninfectious uveitis.

Conclusions :
The present study demonstrates that improvement rate of visual acuity by diagnostic or therapeutic vitrectomy for VO by infections uveitis was not statistically different from those by noninfections uveitis, although pre- and postoperative visual acuity are worse in infectious uveitis than in noninfectious uveitis.

This is an abstract that was submitted for the 2017 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Baltimore, MD, May 7-11, 2017.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×